Galvanometer Spring Weakness and Current Adjustment

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jodi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Galvanometer
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the new current required for full-scale deflection of a galvanometer after its restoring spring weakens by 26.4%, originally needing 36.8 µA. It is established that the deflection angle is directly proportional to the current, leading to the equation kI = k'I'. As the spring constant k diminishes, the current I must increase to maintain the same deflection. Participants clarify that simply multiplying the original current by the percentage of weakening does not yield the correct answer. The conversation emphasizes using algebra to derive the new current based on the weakened spring constant.
Jodi
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Hi; Could someone please help me with the following question: If the restoring spring of a galvanometer weakens by 26.4% over the years, what current will give full-scale deflection if it originally required 36.8uA? Thanks for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jodi said:
Hi; Could someone please help me with the following question: If the restoring spring of a galvanometer weakens by 26.4% over the years, what current will give full-scale deflection if it originally required 36.8uA? Thanks for your help.

You need to make some assumption here about the construction of a galvanometer. I am going to assume you have an ideal case where the angular deflection of the needle is directly proportional to the current because the magnetic field is constructed to achieve that condition, as illustrated here

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/galvan.html

You can then write a direct variation equation that says

Deflection angle = kI

The "weakening of the spring" is saying that k is diminished by 26.4%. So what has to happen to I to achieve the former deflection?
 
Are you saying to do 0.264 x 36.8E-6? Because that doesn't give me the right answer. Thanks.
 
Jodi said:
Are you saying to do 0.264 x 36.8E-6? Because that doesn't give me the right answer. Thanks.

No. To have the same deflection angle, the product of k times I must not change. If k is reduced by some fraction, the current is going to have to increase. Let k' and I' be the "new" values for the weakened spring and k and I be the "old" values that gave the same deflection. Then

k'I' = kI

A little bit of algebra from here will get you to the answer.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top