Gas Bubble Sinks Trawler Off Scotland Coast - Monash Univ. Study

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gas Load
AI Thread Summary
A recent study by Monash University suggests that a trawler found in a methane crater off Scotland's east coast may have been sunk by a large gas bubble. The research highlights the potential dangers of methane gas escaping from the seabed, which could also affect aircraft by causing crashes if they encounter rising gas columns. Some participants in the discussion speculate about connections to mysterious disappearances in the Bermuda Triangle, although this does not explain the loss of aircraft. The findings raise concerns about the implications of underwater gas bubbles on both marine and aerial safety. The study underscores the need for further investigation into the effects of methane on maritime and aviation incidents.
Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
8,194
Reaction score
2,487
In a report published in the September issue of the American Journal of Physics, Monash University's Professor Joseph Monaghan and honours student David May said that a trawler discovered resting in a large methane crater off the east coast of Scotland may have been sunk by a huge gas bubble.

http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/10/22/1066631498889.html
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe some cold war secret bubble weapon !
 
Yeah, maybe methane escaping from sea bed.Or other gases.
Some peeps think Bermuda Triangle 'mysterious disappearence's may be due to this (although that doesn't explain aeroplanes ).
I'm sure I read something about that in New Scientist maybe last year.
I'll post again if I find the article ( don't count on it,as I don't know where all my back issues are)
 
In Reply To Tom D

Well, according to the article, it says that these gas bubbles 'had the potential to cause aircraft to crash'.
 
Yes, I think methane is less dense than air, so airplanes can crash if they suddenly hit a columun of rising gas from the ocean floor.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top