Gas Effusion Rate Problem: He, Cl2, H2, Kr, Rn

AI Thread Summary
A sample of N2 gas is contaminated, with the contaminant effusing at 0.25 times the rate of N2. The relevant equation for determining the mass of the contaminant is Rate x/Rate N2 = (square root of:) Mass N2/Mass x. Initial calculations suggested a mass over 400, which does not match any of the provided options: He, Cl2, H2, Kr, or Rn. A revised approach using nitrogen instead of N2 yielded a mass close to 222, but uncertainty remains about its accuracy. Assistance with the calculations is requested to identify the correct contaminating gas.
Navygal
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
The Problem
A sample of N2 gas is contaminated with a gas. It is found that that contaminant effuses at 0.25 times the rate of N2. What is the contaminating gas?

Choices are: He, Cl2, H2, Kr, Rn

Homework Equations



Rate x/Rate N2 = (square root of:) Mass N2/Mass x

Where Rate x =0.25 Rate N2

The Attempt at a Solution



By plugging in the values I get a mass of x that is over 400, and none of the above choices weight that much

Another option I tried is using just Nitrogen instead of N2 which gives me Mass x = 224 which comes close to the 222 that I got. But I have a feeling that it's wrong and not sure how to justify my answer
Any help would be greatly appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Could you show what you did? I didn't get either of your answers.
 
Navygal said:
The Problem
A sample of N2 gas is contaminated with a gas. It is found that that contaminant effuses at 0.25 times the rate of N2. What is the contaminating gas?

Choices are: He, Cl2, H2, Kr, Rn

Homework Equations



Rate x/Rate N2 = (square root of:) Mass N2/Mass x

Where Rate x =0.25 Rate N2

The Attempt at a Solution



By plugging in the values I get a mass of x that is over 400, and none of the above choices weight that much

Another option I tried is using just Nitrogen instead of N2 which gives me Mass x = 224 which comes close to the 222 that I got. But I have a feeling that it's wrong and not sure how to justify my answer
Any help would be greatly appreciated

If you show us your actual math I'm sure the mistake will present itself. You have the right idea but the arithmetic is off.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top