Gaseous Core Nuclear Thermal Rocket

AI Thread Summary
Gaseous core nuclear thermal rockets (GCNTR) could significantly enhance the feasibility of missions to the outer solar system due to their high efficiency and thrust capabilities. Achieving practical GCNTR technology would require advancements in reactor design and materials, but some believe it is within reach given current nuclear thermal rocket developments. The potential applications of this technology extend beyond space exploration, possibly benefiting various non-space industries. The concept has been popularized in science fiction, notably in "2001: A Space Odyssey," highlighting its imaginative appeal. Overall, GCNTR represents a promising avenue for future propulsion systems in both space and terrestrial applications.
cjackson
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
http://www.projectrho.com/rocket/enginelist.php#id--Gaseous_Core_Nuclear_Thermal_Rocket

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gas_core_reactor_rocket

How practical would this be? How much of a technological leap would be needed to achieve this?

Would it make outer solar system missions possible?

Could the technology be used for non space applications?

I bring this up because Discovery One from 2001: A Space Odyssey apparently uses something like this.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Well we managed to build a fully operational solid core nuclear thermal rocket in the 50's. A closed-cycle gas core reactor is within our capability today I think, if we wanted to. I would guess that any manned mission to Mars would use either nuclear thermal or nuclear electric.
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...
Back
Top