Gauge/Gravity duality and evidence for superstring theory

ShayanJ
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
2,801
Reaction score
606
I don't know much about gauge/gravity duality but I know that its a conjecture coming from superstring theory and one of its examples is AdS/CFT duality. Now I have two questions:

1) As I said, I know that gauge/gravity duality and superstring theory are related but I don't know how much. Is it enough relationship to imply that if gauge/gravity duality predictions about QGP, superconductors, etc. agree with experiments, then these can be counted as experimental evidence in favor of superstring theory and if they don't agree with experiments, these can be counted as evidence against superstring theory?

2) I've read about another example of gauge/gravity duality, Kerr/CFT. Is it as accepted as AdS/CFT(I know AdS/CFT is itself still a conjecture but people are using it anyway)? Is there any other example of gauge/gravity duality?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are various arguments for validity of gauge/gravity correspondence. Some of these arguments are based on string theory, but other arguments are not. Thus, if gauge/gravity correspondence predictions about QGP, superconductors, etc. agree with experiments, that cannot be directly taken as experimental evidence in favor of string theory. Likewise, if they don't agree with experiments, that cannot be directly taken as experimental evidence against string theory.
 
Last edited:
Another general comment. The notions of gauge/gravity correspondence and gauge/gravity duality are usually considered to be synonyms. I think these two concepts should be distinguished:
http://lanl.arxiv.org/abs/1507.00591
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
7K
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Back
Top