Gauss Law for non uniform spherical shell

  • Thread starter nabeel17
  • Start date
  • #1
57
1
So i can see by symmetry arguments why The electric field inside a uniformly charged spherical shell would be zero inside.

But what about a non uniformly charged spherical shell. Say most of the charge is located on one side, why is the electric field still zero? I can see that the flux through any Gaussian surface I draw inside may be zero but when I look at it I don't really understand why the electric field is 0. If most the charge is located on side, I would imagine that a test charge inside would either attract or be repelled since the charge is not uniform. Can someone clear this up for me?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Simon Bridge
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
17,857
1,655
Well - consider the spherical shell is non-uniformly charged as follows ... all the charge is concentrated in a small spot on one side, and the rest is neutral. What is the field?

I think you need to ask - is this a conducting shell, or an insulator?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #3
D H
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Insights Author
15,393
686
Gauss's law does not say that the electrical field inside a non-uniform spherical shell is zero. Consider an extreme case of a spherical shell that contains a point charge, with the rest of the shell vacuum. Is the electrical field inside that shell zero? Of course not.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #4
Redbelly98
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
12,121
160
So i can see by symmetry arguments why The electric field inside a uniformly charged spherical shell would be zero inside.
Symmetry arguments say the field is zero at the center. To say it's zero everywhere inside requires evaluating an integral, which turns out to give zero everywhere inside. This is the Shell Theorem.
 
  • #5
57
1
Ok I can see how the electric field is 0 inside if the sphere is uniformly charged but what if the sphere is not. What if say most of the charge is in one hemisphere?
 
  • #6
D H
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Insights Author
15,393
686
A charged hemisphere looks like a point charge from very far away. Close up, you'll need to use spherical harmonics.
 
  • #7
Vanadium 50
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
26,832
10,507
I think you need to ask - is this a conducting shell, or an insulator?

This was important.
 
  • #8
57
1
Gauss's law does not say that the electrical field inside a non-uniform spherical shell is zero. Consider an extreme case of a spherical shell that contains a point charge, with the rest of the shell vacuum. Is the electrical field inside that shell zero? Of course not.


Right but doesnt Gauss' law say that the flux (EA) = charge enclosed. So say i have a nonuniformly charged shell (maybe not the extreme case but charged more on side then another), the charge enclosed is zero so the electric field is zero? Or am I wrong about that...?
 
  • #9
57
1
Well - consider the spherical shell is non-uniformly charged as follows ... all the charge is concentrated in a small spot on one side, and the rest is neutral. What is the field?

I think you need to ask - is this a conducting shell, or an insulator?

Here i can treat it as a point charge? But then the electric field inside is not zero? Talking about an insulator. The flux equals the charge enclose/epsilon and if the charge enclosed is zero, the E field should be zero inside
 
  • #10
Doc Al
Mentor
45,075
1,382
Right but doesnt Gauss' law say that the flux (EA) = charge enclosed. So say i have a nonuniformly charged shell (maybe not the extreme case but charged more on side then another), the charge enclosed is zero so the electric field is zero? Or am I wrong about that...?
Yes, you are wrong about that. Just because the flux is zero does not mean that the field at any particular point on the surface is zero. The flux is the integral of E*dA over the whole surface; that total will be zero, but the field can certainly be nonzero at various points.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #11
Simon Bridge
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
17,857
1,655
Right but doesnt Gauss' law say that the flux (EA) = charge enclosed.
No it doesn't.
I've been caught out like that too ;)

If you have a point charge (never mind the sphere) you know the field is non-zero everywhere right? Yet it is trivial to draw a surface that does not enclose the charge. Does that mean that suddenly the field is zero everywhere? This is a contradiction so something is wrong. Gauss was smart enough to spot something like that so...

Gausses law actually says that the net flux through a Gaussian surface is proportional to the charge enclosed.

If there are no charges enclosed, then all the flux that enters the region must leave it at some point. If flux goes in one side and out the other, the net flux is zero but there is still flux in the enclosed region and, therefore, a non-zero electric field inside.
 
  • Like
Likes erisedk and nabeel17

Related Threads on Gauss Law for non uniform spherical shell

Replies
5
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
22
Views
4K
Top