Gauss' Law: Is E Attributed to q?

AI Thread Summary
Gauss's law establishes a connection between the electric flux through a closed surface and the charge enclosed within that surface. The electric field (E) is influenced by both internal and external charges. The net electric flux is directly related to the net charge inside the surface; if there is no net charge, there will be no net flux. Therefore, while part of the electric field is attributed to the charge q within the surface, other contributions come from external sources, highlighting the distinction between internal and external electric field influences.
lamp post
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
In gauss' law, is E necessarily attributed to the charge q?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by lamp post
In gauss' law, is E necessarily attributed to the charge q?
I don't understand the question. Gauss's law relates the electric flux through a closed surface to the charge enclosed. The portion of the electric field that creates a net flux can be attributed to the net charge within the surface: if no net charge, then no net flux.
 
Originally posted by lamp post
In gauss' law, is E necessarily attributed to the charge q?

Gauss' law is a relationship between the total flux (electric field times area) through a closed surface to the charge enclosed by that surface. Part of the electric field at each point on the surface is due to the sources inside the surface while other parts of the electric field is due to sources outside the surface. Is that what you're referring to?
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
83
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
2K
Back
Top