Gauss Law of Cube in non-uniform linear Electric Field.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the application of Gauss's Law in the context of a cube placed in a non-uniform linear electric field. Participants explore the implications of the law regarding electric flux through a Gaussian surface and the conditions under which it applies, particularly when external fields are involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that Gauss's Law indicates the electric flux through a Gaussian surface is proportional to the enclosed charge, but expresses confusion about how this applies in a non-uniform electric field.
  • Another participant clarifies that Gauss's Law pertains to the total flux through the entire closed surface rather than individual faces.
  • A subsequent reply emphasizes that if the Gaussian surface encloses no net charge, the net flux should be zero, suggesting that flux through opposite faces should cancel out.
  • One participant questions whether the flux through opposite faces in a non-uniform electric field indeed cancels out, indicating a potential misunderstanding of the law's application in such scenarios.
  • Another participant notes that in non-uniform fields, the total net flux is zero if there is no enclosed charge, but integration over all faces of the Gaussian surface is necessary to determine the flux accurately.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the behavior of electric flux through opposite faces of a cube in a non-uniform electric field. While some assert that the flux should cancel out, others challenge this notion, leading to an unresolved discussion regarding the implications of Gauss's Law in this specific context.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of considering the direction of the electric field and the nature of the Gaussian surface when applying Gauss's Law. There is an acknowledgment that the discussion may require a more nuanced understanding of electric fields, particularly in non-uniform cases.

Hijaz Aslam
Messages
66
Reaction score
1
Gauss's Law states that if a Gaussian Surface encloses a charge ##q_{enc}## then the electric flux through the Gaussian Surface is given by ##\phi=q_{enc}/\varepsilon_{o}## .

It also states that any external field does not contribute to the Electric Flux through the Gaussian Surface.

I am bit confused over there. If we have Gaussian Surface which is a cube placed in a non-uniform linear electric charge (by an infinite sheet for instance, and the Electric Field is parallel (anti-parallel) to the area vector of one of the faces (and the opposite face) ) the Flux through the two opposite faces of the cube does not cancel out. Is this true? What does the Gauss's Law actually states (along with conditions)?
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Gauss' Law for electrical flux is concerned with total flux through the whole closed surface, not through the opposite faces/parts of the surface.
 
zoki85 said:
Gauss' Law for electrical flux is concerned with total flux through the whole closed surface, not through the opposite faces/parts of the surface.

Yes of course not. I forgot to mention the direction of the Electric Field relative to the Cube. Please see the edited question.
 
Net flux through the gaussian surface indicates wether it encloses a net charge or not. No net flux means the surface doesn't enclose any net charge.
For example, if the gaussian surface is a cube placed in an external field, and if cube encloses no net charge, than flux through any two opposite pair of faces must cancel out regardless of direction of external field. BTW, your question is more appropriate for general physics subforum than here.
 
zoki85 - But in the case of non-uniform electric field it does not cancel out the flux of opposite faces, does it?

Can I somehow shift this question to the General Physics section?
 
In general case of nonuniform fields, total net flux is 0 (if qin=0), but you have to integrate over all the faces of the gaussian surface.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 83 ·
3
Replies
83
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K