Gauss' Theorum Applications

In summary: So, I used the radius of .6 cm as well as .25/2 + .6 as the radius in my calculations, and it worked!
  • #1
mitleid
56
1
Two identical conducting spheres each having a radius of 0.460 cm are connected by a light 1.20 m long conducting wire. Determine the tension in the wire if 69.2 (micro)C is placed on one of the conductors. (Hint: Assume that the surface distribution of charge on each sphere is uniform.)

Round your answer to three significant figures. Take the Coulomb constant to be K_e = 8.99 *10^9 N*m^2/C^2

E = K_e (q/r^2) Field on conducting sphere (needed to produce force on string)
E = (1/2*[tex]\Pi[/tex]*[tex]\epsilon[/tex]) q/r^2 Field on -infinite- charged wire (where Epsilon = 8.854*10^-12 C^2/N*m^2)

Force = qE

So far I'm fairly stumped by this problem, though I've been applying Gauss' Theorum most of this afternoon... The charge must be distributed symmetrically, first throughout the sphere in which it is placed. I can solve for the charge at the surface of the first sphere to get something like 2.94 * 10^10 N-C.

From here, I'm thinking the positive charge will be distributed through the conducting wire to the other sphere equally... So each sphere will end up having the same surface charge density and field, which produces a tension on the wire.

Even some conceptual help here would be thoroughly appreciated. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hint: once the charges are distributed evenly... think of the wire just like a rope, or a string... that is preventing the spheres from moving away from each other... what is the force one sphere exerts on the other?
 
  • #3
mitleid said:
Two identical conducting spheres each having a radius of 0.460 cm are connected by a light 1.20 m long conducting wire. Determine the tension in the wire if 69.2 (micro)C is placed on one of the conductors. (Hint: Assume that the surface distribution of charge on each sphere is uniform.)

So far I'm fairly stumped by this problem, though I've been applying Gauss' Theorum most of this afternoon... The charge must be distributed symmetrically, first throughout the sphere in which it is placed. I can solve for the charge at the surface of the first sphere to get something like 2.94 * 10^10 N-C.

How did you arrive at this value? Note that the two spheres are conductors: where on the spheres is the net charge going to end up? What is the effective behavior of the charge found on each sphere?

From here, I'm thinking the positive charge will be distributed through the conducting wire to the other sphere equally... So each sphere will end up having the same surface charge density and field, which produces a tension on the wire.

This part is fine: the mutual repulsion of the equally-charged spheres leads to the tension in the connecting wire. So the critical question at this point is: how do we treat the fields around each sphere? There is an important theorem they should have told you about that will be valuable here... (As you said, the charge on each sphere is [spherically] symmetrically distributed.)
 
  • #4
The net charge ends up distributed symmetrically over both of their surfaces. Will some of the charge be distributed in the wire as well?

I'm using the equation E = (q/r^2)Ke... but do I divide the charge by two first? Unfortunately I'm away from my notes and can't isolate the proper theorum... Also, I have used the radius of .6 cm as well as .25/2 + .6 as the radius in my calculations, but it hasn't worked as of yet. Still missing something...
 
  • #5
mitleid said:
The net charge ends up distributed symmetrically over both of their surfaces. Will some of the charge be distributed in the wire as well?

I'm using the equation E = (q/r^2)Ke... but do I divide the charge by two first? Unfortunately I'm away from my notes and can't isolate the proper theorum... Also, I have used the radius of .6 cm as well as .25/2 + .6 as the radius in my calculations, but it hasn't worked as of yet. Still missing something...

No, you can ignore the charge distributed on the wire...

Think of the spheres as point charges (where the distance between them is the distance between the centers of the spheres)... what is the force one sphere exerts on the other?

Where are you getting the .25/2 and .6?
 
  • #6
Incredible! Thanks very much for the help, this is how I got the solution :

Based on Coulomb's Law, Force(of E field) = Ke*[(q1*q2)/r^2)], where q1 and q2 are equal to one another here (just divide the charge applied to one sphere by two, and square it).

The tricky part was, as usual, using the correct radius. The important distance is from the center of each sphere, which really treats them both as point charges. Plugging in, I got an answer of 1.21 N.

Thanks again for the help. :)
 
  • #7
mitleid said:
Unfortunately I'm away from my notes and can't isolate the proper theorum...

The theorem I was referring to concerns a finite spherically symmetrical charge distribution. Your conducting spheres will each have (effectively) half the total charge "uniformly" arranged on their surfaces, thus each is such a symmetrical distribution. The theorem states that the total charge can then be treated as if it were a point at the center of the sphere. (IIRC, this was originally proved by Newton for mass and gravity using *geometry* -- the proof became simpler with his calculus methods.) So the radii of the conducting spheres is an irrelevant detail.
 

1. What is Gauss' Theorem?

Gauss' Theorem, also known as Gauss' Divergence Theorem, is a fundamental theorem in vector calculus that relates the surface integral of a vector field over a closed surface to the volume integral of the divergence of that vector field over the enclosed volume.

2. How is Gauss' Theorem applied in real-world situations?

Gauss' Theorem has numerous applications in physics, engineering, and other scientific fields. Some common applications include calculating electric or magnetic flux through a closed surface, finding the center of mass of a three-dimensional object, and solving fluid dynamics problems.

3. What are some limitations of Gauss' Theorem?

One limitation of Gauss' Theorem is that it only applies to closed surfaces. Additionally, it is only valid for certain types of vector fields, such as those that are continuous and differentiable.

4. Can Gauss' Theorem be extended to higher dimensions?

Yes, Gauss' Theorem can be extended to higher dimensions through the use of differential forms and the generalized Stokes' Theorem. This allows for the application of the theorem in more complex mathematical spaces.

5. How is Gauss' Theorem related to other mathematical theorems?

Gauss' Theorem is closely related to other important theorems in mathematics, such as Green's Theorem and Stokes' Theorem. These theorems all involve the relationship between surface integrals and volume integrals in different mathematical contexts.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
402
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
26
Views
584
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
775
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
736
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
833
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top