Gaussian beam passing through a circular aperture

AI Thread Summary
The far-field distribution of a Gaussian beam passing through a circular aperture is determined by the Fourier transform of the field at the aperture. If the beam significantly overfills the aperture, the resulting diffraction pattern resembles an Airy function. Conversely, if the beam underfills the aperture, the far-field pattern approaches a Gaussian shape. Intermediate scenarios yield a combination of both patterns, described mathematically by the convolution of the circular aperture function and the Gaussian beam. Understanding these relationships is crucial for predicting diffraction behavior in optical systems.
yoni3468
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

when I have a Gaussian beam passing through a circular aperture:
What should be the far field (Fraunhoffer's) distribution?

Thanks in advance,
Yoni
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The far-field diffraction pattern is the Fourier transform of the field at the aperture. So, it depends on how over- or under-filled the aperture is by the beam. If the beam size is much larger than the aperture, the far-field pattern is close to an Airy function. If the beam severely underfills the aperture, the far-field pattern is nearly a Gaussian. Intermediate cases will present intermediate results- the transform of circ(r/D)*Gaus(ar) = Somb(D*u) # Gaus(u/a), where '#' is the convolution operator, etc.
 
Thank you!

Yoni
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...

Similar threads

Back
Top