Gauss's Law and charged conductors

AI Thread Summary
In the scenario of a conductor with a net charge of +Q and a point charge of -Q inside a hollow cavity, the charge on the outer surface of the conductor is 0. The inner surface of the conductor acquires a charge of +Q to neutralize the -Q point charge, resulting in no excess charge available for the outer surface. Thus, the outer surface remains neutral, confirming that the total charge on the conductor is still +Q. The confusion arises from the misconception that the charges would cancel each other out entirely. Understanding this balance clarifies why the outer surface charge is zero.
veevee
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
A conductor carries a net charge +Q. There is a hollow cavity inside the conductor that contains a point charge -Q. In electrostatic equilibrium,what is the charge on the outer surface of the conductor?

A. -2Q
B. -Q
C. 0
D. Q
E. 2Q


I know that the answer is 0, however, I cannot understand why. i would think that the inner surface of the conductor is +Q to offset the -Q point charge inside, which would make the outer surface +Q in order to account for the net +Q charge. However, that is not the case.

Can some one please offer me some help understanding this problem?Thanks so much
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the charge on the inner surface of the conductor is +Q, and the net charge on the conductor is also +Q, how much charge is left over to distribute on the outer surface?
 
Oh ok, I see. It's 0. For some reason i thought that the +Q and the -Q would cancel out.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top