Gauss's Law: Net Charge Enclosed by Surface?

  • Thread starter Thread starter breez
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gauss's law Law
AI Thread Summary
In Gauss's Law, the net charge used must be entirely enclosed by the Gaussian surface. If a charge is located on the surface, it cannot be fully considered enclosed. However, if necessary, one can account for a portion of the charge on the surface, typically half for a sphere. For other shapes like a cube, the portion could be one-half, one-fourth, or one-eighth, depending on the configuration. Thus, while charges on the surface complicate the application of Gauss's Law, partial inclusion is permissible.
breez
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
I've been taught that in gauss's law, the charge that is used must be the net charge enclosed by a closed gaussian surface. If the charge is located on the surface of the gaussian surface (such as a particle charge) can we still use gauss's law? In other words, am I right in interpreting enclosed charge to mean any charge that that is not outside of the surface?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
breez said:
If the charge is located on the surface of the gaussian surface (such as a particle charge) can we still use gauss's law?
Actually not. But if you have no choice, count only part of the charge on the surface. For a sphere this part may be 1/2. For a cube, 1/2, 1/4 or 1/8
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top