News Gay marriage nearly legalised in NZ

  • Thread starter Thread starter StevieTNZ
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the recent legislative progress in New Zealand regarding the legalization of gay marriage, which is nearing its final approval stage. Participants express support for equal rights for LGBTQ+ individuals, highlighting the importance of societal acceptance and the need for educational efforts to combat discrimination. There is a contrast drawn between New Zealand's progressive stance and the more conservative views in places like Florida, where past amendments have invalidated gay marriage. The conversation touches on the misconception that only LGBTQ+ individuals can advocate for their rights, emphasizing that support can come from allies as well. Overall, there is a sense of optimism for future changes in attitudes and laws regarding gay rights, both in New Zealand and potentially in other regions like Florida.
StevieTNZ
Messages
1,934
Reaction score
873
Physics news on Phys.org
Excellent!
I don't know anything about your political system, but it appears from the link that you're making a good transition to reality. Although I'm straight, it churns my bile that gays and transgenders aren't allotted equal rights in some jurisdictions. Anyone who feels threatened by their happiness is too insecure to hold an opinion.
 
Wonderful! I hope the complete legalization happens soon.
 
Heard on the radio this morning it passed 77 to 44.

I'm not gay but I agree 100% with what Danger said.
 
http://inthehouse.co.nz/node/18213

and LOL at the comments made at 1:16 - http://inthehouse.co.nz/node/18214

and the final vote: http://inthehouse.co.nz/node/18232
 
Last edited by a moderator:
StevieTNZ said:
http://inthehouse.co.nz/node/18213

and LOL at the comments made at 1:16 - http://inthehouse.co.nz/node/18214

and the final vote: http://inthehouse.co.nz/node/18232

The first link mentions other discrimination in other countries.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
i do not even understand why it's on law books.
 
Greg Bernhardt said:
Good news! NZ is on the right track!

Maybe one day, we all are.

But that requires a lot of educational work.
 
  • #10
I hope Florida goes in that direction. I'm straight but support gay rights.
 
  • #11
krash661 said:
i do not even understand why it's on law books.

Would you be able to elaborate on that statement, please?
 
  • #12
Julio R said:
I hope Florida goes in that direction. I'm straight but support gay rights.

I'm in Florida too. I heard from my friend that the Florida constitution was actually amended to make gay marriage invalid here. People voted to not allow gays the same rights as everyone else. I bet if there was another vote, the voters would probably be in favor of gay marriage. It's just a matter of time. I don't know why people are clinging to their antiquated beliefs as if the push for gay marriage is going to go away.

And it's dumb how some people will think that you must be gay to be supporting gay marriage. I noticed you added a caveat that you're not gay. That just shows their selfishness. Not only do they not care if other people get rights, but they can't understand why someone who isn't a part of an oppressed group would care about that group.
 
  • #13
leroyjenkens said:
I'm in Florida too. I heard from my friend that the Florida constitution was actually amended to make gay marriage invalid here. People voted to not allow gays the same rights as everyone else. I bet if there was another vote, the voters would probably be in favor of gay marriage. It's just a matter of time. I don't know why people are clinging to their antiquated beliefs as if the push for gay marriage is going to go away.

And it's dumb how some people will think that you must be gay to be supporting gay marriage. I noticed you added a caveat that you're not gay. That just shows their selfishness. Not only do they not care if other people get rights, but they can't understand why someone who isn't a part of an oppressed group would care about that group.
Florida is a red state (conservative), and therefore not too open to gay rights.
 
  • #14
Evo said:
Florida is a red state (conservative), and therefore not too open to gay rights.

I 100% agree. Most of the people I know, including my parents and my girlfriend's father are against it, even some liberals oppose it here.
 
  • #15
Greg Bernhardt said:
Good news! NZ is on the right track!

It's good that New Zealand is being more progressive when it comes to human rights issues.

In terms of those that oppose homosexuals and homosexual marriage, or one or the other. I kind of get it (not in the sense of reasoning that they are opposing it). It's hard to be empathetic if you do not understand what it is like to be brandish constantly by negative connotations and bullied because of your orientation. Most of these individuals have had little to no worry of being ostracized because of who they are, so they don't know nor can they envision what it is like. Of course, there are those of us who can put ourselves outside of who we are and try to connect, empathize with those who are different using the powers of our consciousness. This is a basic human component of life, some have it, others seem to lack it.

Then again, there are those who don't necessarily lack that component and actually do care about people that are different, but because they have been brought up a certain way it would seem as though they would have to cut and burn those webs of negativity from their own lives.
 
  • #17
StevieTNZ said:
Gay marriage will be legal in NZ from tomorrow.

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10913830

Congrats! Let me assure you the earthquakes have nothing at all to do with this :wink: :-p, although there is a certain "church" here that will tell you otherwise (**cough*westboro baptist*cough*).

We legalized gay marriage in my state (Washington) a few months ago, as it should be, IMO.
 
  • #18
Good for NZ, my gay friends will be pleased.
 
  • #19
jadair1 said:
I'm not gay
Why do you need to mention that?
 
  • #20
I_am_learning said:
Why do you need to mention that?

I'm not gay either. <shrug>
 
  • #21
I am, though, since the issue is, apparently, whether to mention it or not.<shrug>
 
  • #22
Make sure there is a distinction between "rights" and preferential treatment.
 
  • #23
HowlerMonkey said:
Make sure there is a distinction between "rights" and preferential treatment.
Which has been the case where civil unions between heterosexuals have entitled them to various legal and monetary benefits relative to similar homosexual couples.

For example, the spouse is given "next of kin" status, something that is important, for example. not only in terms of conferred inheritance rights, but also such delicate matters as the right to visit the person at the hospital.
 
  • #24
I_am_learning said:
Why do you need to mention that?

To show that it is not only gay's that can be in support of gay marriage.
 
  • #25
Evo said:
Florida is a red state (conservative), and therefore not too open to gay rights.

Evo, isn't it more accurate to refer to Florida as a "purple" state (i.e. neither truly conservative nor truly liberal), given the increasing proportion of Florida's population who move there from other areas of the US where more liberal views are commonplace?

(Of course, Florida also attracts a substantial number of immigrants, but I suspect that many immigrant communities may not be too open to gay rights either).
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
6K
Replies
350
Views
28K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
28
Views
5K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Back
Top