Gear Size Selection for Small Direct Drive Racing Cars

  • Thread starter Thread starter steven mosher
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gear
AI Thread Summary
Selecting the right gear ratio is crucial for optimizing speed in small direct drive racing cars, as there is no shifting involved. A typical drive train ratio is 4.76:1, but variations like a 29 engine gear with a 23 axel gear can offer performance benefits due to lower weight and moments of inertia. However, smaller gears provide less torque, which can affect acceleration and deceleration despite higher angular speeds. Lighter chains also contribute to quicker speed changes, but they may wear out faster and compromise strength. Experimentation with gear selections is essential to find the optimal setup for performance.
steven mosher
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
My son races small cars that are direct drive. An engine, engine gear, chain, and axel gear.

Since there is no shifting finding the right gear ratio is critcial to the speed of the car. By examining the dyno reports on the engine and through trial and error you can determine the best gear ratio for
the car. For example, a total drive train gear ratio would typically be
4.76:1. where the engine gear box is 6:1, the engine gear has 34 teeth
and the axel gear has 27 teeth.

However, there other ways to achieve the same ratio. for example with a 29 engine, 23 axel gear. Theoretically which option should provide the
beter perfrormnce. The 29 gear will be smaller and lighter with lower moments of interia.. will such a drive train slow down faster and speed up faster?

Same goes for the chain.. what is the impact of a lightweight chain..

Small differences in top speed (<10% ) are critical.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The 29 gear will be smaller and lighter with lower moments of interia.. will such a drive train slow down faster and speed up faster?

Yes that is true; however, keep in mind that the smaller the gear is, the less torque it will provide to the drive shaft. You will have higher angular speeds, but loose torque as a consequence. Most real cars have about a 1:1 ratio of torque and horsepower (High performance). Id say play around till you find a good gear selection by doing controlled experiments where you time the car to travel a certain distance and analyze which gears work the best. Lighter material the better, but the faster it will wear and tear on you as well.
 
Last edited:
cyrusabdollahi said:
Yes that is true; however, keep in mind that the smaller the gear is, the less torque it will provide to the drive shaft. You will have higher angular speeds, but loose torque as a consequence.

Nope, if the ratios of the two sets of gears are the same, the torque step-up and speed step-down will be identical between the two pairs of gears.

Smaller gears will indeed have less rotational intertia, and therefore speed up and decelerate more quickly (this is why performance engines often have lightened flywheels).

One issue to bear in mind (which cyrusabdollahi touched on) is that smaller gears will wear more quickly, be under more stress, and heat up more than larger gears. There is also obviously a lower limit on size for which it would be impracticable (engineeringly speaking!) to go below.

Regarding the chain, yes, a lightweight chain will have less inertia, and therefore accelerate and decelerate more quickly. Again though, it's easy to get carried away lightning things without realising how much strength you're losing. Follow Colin Chapman's advice - "add lightness".
 
Last edited:
your right, what was I thinking, oh yeah I wasnt.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
12K
Replies
37
Views
47K
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
6K
Back
Top