General differential equation solution for Kepler Problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the Kepler problem and the possibility of finding a general solution for the motion of two or more bodies based on their masses, positions, and velocities. It is noted that while a specific solution exists, it is impractical for direct application due to its complexity. The conversation highlights that there is no general solution for three or more bodies, as their trajectories can become erratic and sensitive to initial conditions. Numerical methods are suggested as a viable approach to approximate solutions for multi-body systems. Overall, the thread emphasizes the limitations of analytical solutions in classical mechanics for complex systems.
Steve Jones
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
To be honest, I don't know any physics. I am a high school student who has taken high school physics, but America's education system isn't known for teaching much more than Newton's laws. I have, however, taken Multivariable/Vector calculus, so I have a decent math background.

I was wondering is there is a specific form of the solution to the Kepler problem. The initial conditions would be the masses, positions, and velocities. I have found this link to the wikipedia solution, but I wonder if it is possible to have a solution that I can just plug the masses, velocities, and positions in and get an equation for the motion of both bodies.

Also, I wonder if that solution could be generalized to include however many bodies you want. The wikipedia article said it could not be solve in terms of first integrals, but I wonder if there is a general solution for n-bodies.

Please be nice to me :P I don't possesses a vast knowledge of physics (or any at all). I also don't know if this thread is in the right place either.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Steve Jones said:
I have found this link to the wikipedia solution, but I wonder if it is possible to have a solution that I can just plug the masses, velocities, and positions in and get an equation for the motion of both bodies.
It is possible to make that, but the formula would be too long to be practical. It is easier to calculate all the relevant quantities step by step, as shown in the article and books.
Steve Jones said:
Also, I wonder if that solution could be generalized to include however many bodies you want. The wikipedia article said it could not be solve in terms of first integrals, but I wonder if there is a general solution for n-bodies.
There is not.
 
Thank you for the response.
 
The problem is that from three bodies on, in general, the trajectories get very erratic. Minute differences between starting points make the difference between a stable situation and one where one of the bodies gets ejected from the system.
 
Steve Jones said:
To be honest, I don't know any physics. I am a high school student who has taken high school physics, but America's education system isn't known for teaching much more than Newton's laws. I have, however, taken Multivariable/Vector calculus, so I have a decent math background.
snipAlso, I wonder if that solution could be generalized to include however many bodies you want. The wikipedia article said it could not be solve in terms of first integrals, but I wonder if there is a general solution for n-bodies.

Please be nice to me :P I don't possesses a vast knowledge of physics (or any at all). I also don't know if this thread is in the right place either.

Hi Steve: You know a heck of a lot more than most high schoolers. Most of them wouldn't know a differential equation from differential fluid.
In classical mechanics courses following general college physics they discuss the "three-body problem". There is no general solution to 3 or more bodies. You can, however, use numerical methods to approximate a solution to whatever degree you want.
I disagree with your statement that you don't know any physics.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top