General Gauge Invariance Problem

llorgos
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hi!

I have to prove that the amplitude of the process

\gamma \gamma \to W^+ W^-

does not depend on the gauge we will choose, R_{\xi}.

So I use the most general expressions for the propagators and vertices. I find 5 diagrams. One that involves only the 4 fields and a vertex, 1 t and one u channel with a W boson as propagator and 1 t and 1 u where the propagator is a non-physical field \phi.

I just sum up the last 4, since the first one does not depend on the \xi parameter but then I am stuck since nothing seems to make the horrible expressions in such a way that there will be no gauge dependence in the end..

Any help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
llorgos said:
non-physical field \phi.

What is this unphysical field? - A ghost? If it is, I don't see how you make the diagram. If it's some field I don't know, please elaborate.
 
It is a goldstone boson coming around in the R_{\xi} gauge. Actually it is the charged one.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top