# General relativity and scale

1. Feb 19, 2009

### sirchasm

Einstein's remainder encodes (= formulates) a universal energy background as mass, in terms of a limit for this energy in discrete terms; the limit represents a bound for the other two components, the e and u that modulate spacetime M; time is then generated by a linear transform of these components as a binary wave, in spacetime.

(first up, is E=mc^2 a remainder? It's certainly invariant)

Is the remainder a one-way function? Can the structure of the universal spacetime be recovered from a universal mass term and universal energy? Can a transform be built that is Turing-complete?
We know the transforms we use might be universal, but when we encode the physical constants that appear to be the limits of our local frame = (G,h,c), the results don't connect to the apparent distant limits when we use the same constants, so we see a lot more energy in this large space than there should be (apparently).

(what does Turing-complete mean in this context)

2. Feb 20, 2009

### sirchasm

I think it has to do with another e, not charge but exponentiation of charge.
Because e is a series and an integral (it has a geometry too), it encapsulates enumeration, sum and product and curvature, it's a complete yet infinitely-scaled value, of numbers, or a number.

That is, e is gauged ( = measured, calculated) by 1 and infinity.

c, the special velocity of light is too; since the m in $$E=mc^2\,$$ is too, or is at least molar, it doesn't inform the low end except exp doesn't ever vanish. The GR scale is: "to molarity and beyond"

Last edited: Feb 20, 2009
3. Feb 22, 2009

### sirchasm

So we don't see, generally, anything unless it's made out of a lot of atoms, or an atom 'emits' something a lot of times (over a small time).
This is the molar gauge, which we might envisage as a point of intersection, which can't be "the point = e", since e counts, both atoms and single atom 'events', it defines a series, and the sum of a series (it's a countable infinity)

When we do use 'single' atoms and control their 'positions' with electric fields and their internal spin-energies with magnetic fields, they vanish from what we call a thermodynamic state and 'resonate' in place together, they self-assemble or condense in a strictly non-Avogadrian way,

Avogadro has to take his number and leave the room for a while.