General Relativity - Circular Orbit around Earth

  • #31
Recall that the correct expression for the light pulse is ds^2 = -\left( 1 - \frac{2GM}{c^2r} \right) c^2 dt^2 + \left( 1 + \frac{2GM}{c^2r} \right) dr^2

##ds = 0##, but ##dt \neq 0## and ##dr \neq 0##.

But you just need to find ##\Delta \tau = \int d\tau## for the total round trip of the light. So, you don't need to worry about ##dt## or ##dr##.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
TSny said:
Recall that the correct expression for the light pulse is ds^2 = -\left( 1 - \frac{2GM}{c^2r} \right) c^2 dt^2 + \left( 1 + \frac{2GM}{c^2r} \right) dr^2

##ds = 0##, but ##dt \neq 0## and ##dr \neq 0##.

But you just need to find ##\Delta \tau = \int d\tau## for the total round trip of the light. So, you don't need to worry about ##dt## or ##dr##.

Yeah, but ##d\tau = 0## so ##\int d\tau = 0##. So from the light's perspective, no time has passed at all. Does this even make sense?
 
  • #33
unscientific said:
Yeah, but ##d\tau = 0## so ##\int d\tau = 0##. So from the light's perspective, no time has passed at all.
That's right. Of course, no physical observer can travel at the speed of light. But, in a thought experiment, you can imagine the observer moving at 0.99999...c (add as many 9's as you wish). The time elapsed for this observer will approach zero. It's the ultimate "twin paradox" scenario where the traveling twin would not age at all!
Does this even make sense?
It's strange, but it's a natural consequence of SR and GR.
 
  • Like
Likes unscientific

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
893
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K