General Relativity Problem (frames of reference)

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 2K views
RJLiberator
Gold Member
Messages
1,094
Reaction score
63

Homework Statement


A clock moving at v = (3/5)c reads 12:00 as it passes us in our frame of reference, how far away will it be (in light hours) when it reads 1:00.

Homework Equations


I denote a prime to mean the reference frame of the clock at rest. I use regular lettering to denote 'our' frame of reference.

c = speed of light

t' = t/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
L' = L*sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)

L = v*t

The Attempt at a Solution



Alright, I use Lorentz contraction to solve this problem.

First I find the length L using v and t = 1 hr. L = (3/5)c*1 hr = (3/5)c light hours.
Now, I use Lorentz contraction to find L'
L' = (3/5)c*sqrt(1-9/25)
L' = 12c/25
 
Physics news on Phys.org
RJLiberator said:

Homework Statement


A clock moving at v = (3/5)c reads 12:00 as it passes us in our frame of reference, how far away will it be (in light hours) when it reads 1:00.

Homework Equations


I denote a prime to mean the reference frame of the clock at rest. I use regular lettering to denote 'our' frame of reference.

c = speed of light

t' = t/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
L' = L*sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)

L = v*t

The Attempt at a Solution



Alright, I use Lorentz contraction to solve this problem.

First I find the length L using v and t = 1 hr. L = (3/5)c*1 hr = (3/5)c light hours.
Now, I use Lorentz contraction to find L'
L' = (3/5)c*sqrt(1-9/25)
L' = 12c/25
First of all, 12c/25 has units of speed, not distance.

When one hour elapses in "our" frame of reference, the clock has traveled 3/5 light⋅hour (in our frame).

From "our" point of view the moving clock runs slower than normal, so when the clock reads 1:00, it will have traveled farther than 3/5light⋅hours.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RJLiberator
Thank you for your assistance SammyS.

I see the difference now in light hours. When saying 12c/25, that is incorrect as it is a speed. I should have said 12/25 light hours. Noted.

In our FOR it is clear that the clock traveled a distance of 3/5 light hours.
So I can use time dilation here to see:

[tex]t' = \frac{1hr} {\sqrt{1-\frac{\frac{9c^2} {25}} {c^2}}}[/tex]
[tex]t' = 1.25 hr[/tex]

Therefore, we say the distance will be 1.25 hr * 3c/5 = 3/4 light hours.

3/4 light hours > 3/5 light hours

Is that now a correct line of reasoning?
 
RJLiberator said:
Thank you for your assistance SammyS.

I see the difference now in light hours. When saying 12c/25, that is incorrect as it is a speed. I should have said 12/25 light hours. Noted.

In our FOR it is clear that the clock traveled a distance of 3/5 light hours.
So I can use time dilation here to see:

[tex]t' = \frac{1hr} {\sqrt{1-\frac{\frac{9c^2} {25}} {c^2}}}[/tex]
[tex]t' = 1.25 hr[/tex]

Therefore, we say the distance will be 1.25 hr * 3c/5 = 3/4 light hours.

3/4 light hours > 3/5 light hours

Is that now a correct line of reasoning?
Yes. That's what I get.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RJLiberator