General Relativity vs. gravitons/force

In summary, the conversation discusses the individual's desire to continue learning about physics and their attempts to increase their knowledge in the subject. They mention their understanding of General Relativity and how it contradicts some concepts such as gravity being a force and the existence of gravitons as carriers of that force. The conversation concludes by stating that there is still much unknown about the quantization of gravity and how it all fits together.
  • #1
crschoen
2
0
Hello. I've been out of college for 10+ years now, but have never lost the desire to learn more. So I've been trying to increase my physics knowledge, which I feel was not very strong despite some college level physics classes (they seemed to focus too much of classical physics in my view).

I have been trying to read simpler books, but often come across questions that I cannot resolve, and not having the benefit of being able to ask anyone else about this stuff thought I would post one such question here.

I think I have a fairly decent understanding of General Relativity now. That is that gravity is equivalent to acceleration, and that gravity is not a force but merely an illusion of force caused by the warping of space-time that causes matter to move along the geodisc. In other words there is no actual force pushing our feet to the floor, but we perceive it to be a force.

Not long after feeling I had a good grasp on this, I read a couple things that seem to contradict General Relativity:

1. Descriptions of four fundamental forces include Gravity. But wait just a second, I thought it was not a force?

2. Gravitons - these are the carriers of the force of gravity. But wait just a second, I thought gravity was not a force?

What puzzles me is that in my readings of General Relativity, it seems like it has withstood every scientific test since it was proposed by Einstein (from the famous solar eclipse in 1919 onward). So why do we have these conflicting concepts of gravitons and gravitational force?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
In other words there is no actual force pushing our feet to the floor, but we perceive it to be a force.
Well, there is an actual force pushing the floor to our feet. It carries us away from the geodesic.
1. Descriptions of four fundamental forces include Gravity. But wait just a second, I thought it was not a force?
Yes, that is a problem. You could phrase it more neutral and speak about interactions, which does not contradict GR. But still, you have three forces described in a similar way, and gravity described in a fundamentally different way. Nobody knows how the descriptions could be united.
2. Gravitons - these are the carriers of the force of gravity. But wait just a second, I thought gravity was not a force?
There are gravitational waves (at least supposedly), described by the classical theory GR. If you stipulate that these waves come in quanta just like electromagnetic waves are quantized as photons, you can derive the properties of those "gravitons", like mass 0 and spin 2, from the classical field.
Since gravitational waves are geometric perturbations, you could think of gravitons as the quanta of geometric perturbations, and get the semantics straight.
But again, nobody knows how to quantize gravity, so we can't really say how gravitons fit in.
 
  • #3


First of all, congratulations on your continued pursuit of knowledge and your interest in physics! It's great to see someone with a passion for learning and understanding.

To address your question, it's important to understand that General Relativity and the concept of gravitons/force are not necessarily contradictory. They are two different ways of understanding and describing the same phenomenon – gravity.

In General Relativity, gravity is described as the curvature of space-time caused by the presence of mass and energy. This theory has been extremely successful in explaining and predicting various phenomena, from the bending of light around massive objects to the existence of black holes.

On the other hand, the concept of gravitons and gravitational force is based on the idea of a particle – the graviton – that mediates the force of gravity between objects with mass. This is part of the Standard Model of particle physics, which describes the fundamental particles and forces in the universe.

So, while General Relativity explains gravity in terms of the curvature of space-time, the concept of gravitons and force explains it in terms of particles and interactions between them. They are two different ways of looking at the same phenomenon, and both have been supported by experimental evidence.

In fact, some scientists are currently working on theories that aim to reconcile these two perspectives, such as the theory of quantum gravity. But for now, both General Relativity and the concept of gravitons/force are valid and useful ways of understanding gravity.

I hope this helps to clarify things for you and encourages you to continue your exploration of physics. Keep asking questions and seeking answers – that's the best way to learn and expand your knowledge.
 

1. What is the difference between General Relativity and gravitons/force?

General Relativity is a theory of gravity that describes the relationship between mass, space, and time. It explains how gravity works as a curvature of space-time caused by the presence of mass. On the other hand, gravitons/force is a theoretical particle that is believed to carry the force of gravity. It is a concept used in quantum mechanics to explain how gravity behaves at a subatomic level.

2. Which theory is more accurate in describing gravity?

Both General Relativity and gravitons/force have their strengths and limitations. General Relativity has been extensively tested and has been proven to accurately describe the behavior of gravity in large-scale systems such as the solar system. However, it fails to explain the behavior of gravity at a quantum level. On the other hand, gravitons/force is a theoretical concept that has not yet been experimentally proven. Therefore, it is difficult to determine which theory is more accurate in describing gravity.

3. Can General Relativity and gravitons/force be reconciled?

Many scientists are working on finding a way to reconcile General Relativity and gravitons/force. Some theories, such as String Theory, attempt to merge these two theories. However, there is currently no widely accepted theory that successfully combines the two.

4. How does General Relativity explain the bending of light by gravity?

According to General Relativity, gravity is not a force but rather the curvature of space-time caused by the presence of mass. When light passes through this curved space-time, it appears to bend as it follows the path of least resistance. This phenomenon is known as gravitational lensing and has been observed and confirmed by numerous experiments.

5. How do scientists study and test these theories?

Scientists use a variety of methods to study and test General Relativity and gravitons/force. This includes conducting experiments, making observations, and performing mathematical calculations. For General Relativity, scientists can test its predictions by observing the behavior of massive objects in space or by measuring the bending of light around massive objects. As for gravitons/force, scientists can study its effects on subatomic particles in particle accelerators or through theoretical calculations.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
15
Views
970
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
30
Views
760
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
23
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
446
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
88
Views
5K
Back
Top