General Work Functions: Validity Check

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving a general work function for both rigid and deformable systems using force and displacement vector functions. For the rigid system, the proposed equation involves integrating the dot product of the total force and the derivative of the position vector over time. In the case of deformable systems with multiple forces, the work is expressed as a sum of integrals of individual forces. The participant suggests starting from the differential work equation and changing the variable to time for further validation. The conversation seeks confirmation on the validity of these formulations.
Ludwig
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to derive a general work function (provided force and displacement vector-valued functions). Below are my best guesses. Can someone let me know whether these are valid?

Rigid-System:
## \sum W = \int \left ( \sum \vec{F}(t)\cdot \vec{r}\,'(t) \right ) dt ##

Deformable-system (n-forces):
## \sum W = \sum_{k=0}^{n} \left (\int ( \vec{F}_{k}(t)\cdot \vec{r}\,'(t)\,) dt \right) ##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
##F(t)\cdot\vec r(t) = W(t)##

So ##\sum W = \sum \vec F(t) \cdot \vec r(t)## notice: no integral on the RHS.

Try starting from: ##\text{d}W = \vec F_{tot} \cdot \text{d}\vec r## and change variable to time.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top