Generalised Momentum: Defs & Meaning

  • Thread starter Thread starter Incand
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum
AI Thread Summary
Generalized momentum can be defined in two ways: one based on the Lagrangian (p_i = ∂L/∂dot q_i) and the other on kinetic energy (p_i = ∂T/∂dot q_i). The distinction arises when potential energy is dependent on velocity, such as in systems with magnetic fields, making the kinetic energy definition less applicable. In simple mechanical systems, potential energy typically does not depend on velocity, allowing both definitions to align. However, the canonical definition of momentum is strictly tied to the Lagrangian formulation. Understanding these nuances is crucial for accurate application in various physical scenarios.
Incand
Messages
334
Reaction score
47
I have two books that define generalised momentum differently. Either
##p_i = \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot q_i}##
or
##p_i = \frac{\partial T}{\partial \dot q_i}##.
Is this since defining generalised momentum only make sense when the potential energy is independent of a coordinate ##q## and hence the above definitions are equal? Or is one of these more general than the other?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The differentiations should be done with respect to the time derivative of ##q##, not ##q## itself. Is ##T## the kinetic energy? In most simple mechanical systems the potential energy is not dependent on velocity.
 
  • Like
Likes Incand
hilbert2 said:
The differentiations should be done with respect to the time derivative of ##q##, not ##q## itself. Is ##T## the kinetic energy? In most simple mechanical systems the potential energy is not dependent on velocity.

Thanks, missed the dots. Added them now. Yes ##T## is the kinetic energy. Is it possible that the potential energy ##V## depends on ##\dot q##? Is one of these definitions correct in that case?
 
If there are magnetic fields and electric charges in the system, the potential energy depends on velocities. Then you can't use the definition where you differentiate ##T##.
 
  • Like
Likes Incand
Cheers! That was a good example!
 
The momentum canonically conjugated to the generalized coordinate ##q^i## is defined by
$$p_i=\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}^i},$$
and nothing else!
 
  • Like
Likes Incand
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top