A Generalized Coordinates and Porn

AI Thread Summary
Generalized coordinates are a set of parameters that describe the configuration of a mechanical system, allowing for a more flexible representation than traditional Cartesian coordinates. They are defined as local coordinates on a configuration manifold and can vary based on the system's constraints. The term "generalized" applies when the coordinates can represent the minimum necessary variables to describe the system's state, such as using polar coordinates (r, θ) instead of Cartesian (x, y). Additionally, in classical mechanics, kinetic energy is dependent not only on generalized velocities but also on generalized coordinates, as demonstrated through transformations like expressing kinetic energy in polar coordinates. Understanding these concepts is crucial for applying variational methods in mechanics.
observer1
Messages
81
Reaction score
11
Yes, that is a serious title for the thread.

Could someone please define GENERALIZED COORDINATES?

In other words (and with a thread title like that, I damn well better be sure there are other words )
  1. I understand variational methods, Lagrange, Hamilton, (and all that).
  2. I understand the pendulum and the distinction between x/y and r/theta
  3. I understand how generalized velocities can depend on generalized coordinates and so on.
  4. I understand how they represent the minimum variables needed to describe a system...

OK. But could someone provide a clear, concise definition of the word "generalized?" What makes x/y Cartesian and r/theta "generalized?" When does one have the right to attach the modifier "generalized" to a coordinate system describing a mechanical (or otherwise) system?

What is a generalized coordinate?
(I know it when I see it -- like porn -- but I can't define it.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Generalized coordinates are local coordinates on configuration manifold
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Wow... that was good... thanks!

May I ask for one more thing?

It turns out the in classical mechanics, the kinetic energy is not just a function of the generalized velocities. It is also a function of the generalized coordinate.

(As you must well know, KE = 0.5 * m * v * v. But when the coordinates are generalized, the coordinate also appears in the KE.)

In the context of your previous answer, could you demonstrate why this happens?
 
the kinetic energy is Riemann metric on configuration manifold (precisely speaking, quadric part of the kinetic energy)

Assume we have a particle of mass ##m## moving on a plane. The kinetic energy is ##T=m(\dot x^2+\dot y^2)/2##; now express the kinetic energy in terms of polar coordinates: ##x=r\cos\phi,\quad y=r\sin\phi##;
 
And, thank you once again!
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'A scenario of non-uniform circular motion'
(All the needed diagrams are posted below) My friend came up with the following scenario. Imagine a fixed point and a perfectly rigid rod of a certain length extending radially outwards from this fixed point(it is attached to the fixed point). To the free end of the fixed rod, an object is present and it is capable of changing it's speed(by thruster say or any convenient method. And ignore any resistance). It starts with a certain speed but say it's speed continuously increases as it goes...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top