Generate AC/DC w/o Contact Brushes: Is It Possible?

  • Thread starter Thread starter FulhamFan3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Generators Motors
AI Thread Summary
It is possible to generate AC or DC electricity without contact brushes by using induction motors, which can function as generators. A common method involves using a permanent magnet near or within a coil, or converting a standard AC induction motor into a generator by adding a capacitor across the output. This setup allows the rotor to spin and generate a significant AC voltage, provided the motor is spun fast enough and the capacitor is appropriately selected. Most motorcycle alternators operate without brushes, utilizing a stator field coil and a rotor design that eliminates the need for slip rings. Overall, induction motors inherently possess the capability to generate electricity when configured correctly.
FulhamFan3
Messages
134
Reaction score
0
I just saw a demonstration of an induction motors and was wondering if its possible to build an AC or DC generator without contact brushes? The only way I can think of is if you have a permanant magnet spinning near or within a coil or wire. Is there anyway to produce a magetic field with just kinetic motion? I've searched the net and haven't found any explanation. If you have a link please include it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Most motorcycle alternators have no brushes. There is a stator field coil held in place from one side, a steel rotor comprised of 2 halves with a zigzag separation cantilevered in from the other side, and pickup coils on the outside. It works the same as an automotive unit except that since it only has a bearing on one side, the field coil can come in from the other and needs not rotate. In the automotive unit, there are bearings on both sides so slip rings and brushes are needed to activate the field coil.
 
Originally posted by FulhamFan3
I just saw a demonstration of an induction motors and was wondering if it's possible to build an AC or DC generator without contact brushes?

Yes, and you can even convert a standard AC induction motor into an AC generator. All motors act as generators (that's why a motor uses more energy when you ask it to perform more work, and why a motor stops drawing energy if allowed to spin frictionlessly.) AC induction motors are a little weird, but since they already are generators inherently, there must be a way to use them as stand-alone generators.

The secret: add a capacitor across the output. Then, as the rotor spins, a large AC voltage builds up and a large current exists between the motor coil and the capacitor. Spin the motor fast enough, and choose the right value of capacitor, and you'll have a 120VAC 60Hz generator.

See: http://www.qsl.net/ns8o/Induction_Generator.html
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top