Generating a Resonance Curve for a System: A Puzzling Problem

AI Thread Summary
To generate a resonance curve for a system given its natural frequency, understanding the system's transfer function is crucial. The resonance curve typically exhibits a bell-shaped peak at the natural frequency, influenced by the system's damping characteristics. Without a defined transfer function, discussions remain general, focusing on the need for additional parameters like damping ratios. The response function for many resonant systems follows a Lorentzian shape rather than a Gaussian, with the real part indicating energy absorption and the imaginary part representing reactive energy. For further insights, exploring resources on resonance and transfer functions is recommended.
abcdmichelle
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



if i know the natural frequency of a system, how can I generate a resonance curve for the system in terms of frequency vs amplitude.


The Attempt at a Solution



I know it will have one peak, like a bell curve and the max will be the natural frequency, but i don't know how to graph a theoretical fft.
i think i should generate a random number of frequencies, or something along those lines!?

please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Presumably you have a system transfer function. What form is it in?
 
i don't! :(

All I have is the natural frequency in rad/sec.
 
Well, do you know anything else about the system? Is it a second order system with damping ratios and so forth? Without the actual transfer function you can only speak in generalities. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RLC_circuit" for an RLC circuit.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Many simple resonant systems in nature have a Lorentzian line shape or response function. The function is complex; the real part represents energy absorption, the imaginary part is dispersive or reactive (potential energy). If you just plot the magnitude or the magnitude squared, they are, indeed, bell shaped--but they are not Gaussian. Look up "resonance" on Wikipedia for an introduction. You'll find the magnitude squared expression under the "Theory" heading.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top