Generating Power with a Motor and Generator Setup

  • Thread starter Thread starter jaypar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Generator Power
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a proposed setup using a 15 amp motor connected to an alternator via a pulley system, intended to recharge a battery while powering a generator with a second 13 amp motor. Participants express skepticism about the feasibility of this design, highlighting that the system likely cannot generate more power than it consumes due to inherent energy losses. The local car parts store's claim that the setup can produce an additional 45 amps is questioned, with concerns that the battery will eventually drain faster than it can be recharged. Overall, the consensus suggests that relying on a gas-powered generator would be a more practical solution for powering a house. The idea appears to be an attempt at perpetual motion, which is deemed unachievable.
jaypar
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi I have this idea I was thinking of: may not be great but seems to be good.
The idea is to have a 15 amp motor connected to a alternator via a pulley/belt system.
Having that motor connected to a inverter, so when you turn on the inverter it would turn on the power to the motor causing the alternator to turn. Then by activating the voltage regulator on the alternator you should start making the battery recharge right? If so you should be able to connect a second motor at 13 amps which would then be connected to a generator. Using the 13 amp motor instead of the gas motor you should be able run the generator right?

The guys at the local car parts store saw that the first motor actually charges the battery while it is hooked up to the inverter and the alternator. The in verter should according to the voltometer they put on it shows it has an additional 45 amps, output so it stands to reason one more motor running less than the motor connected to the alternator should keep the battery charged for some time before having to change the battery. In the mean time you can have all the lights in the house connected to the generator. there for illiminating part of your electric bill due to the lights being powered that way.

Would this be right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jaypar said:
Hi I have this idea I was thinking of: may not be great but seems to be good.
The idea is to have a 15 amp motor connected to a alternator via a pulley/belt system.
Having that motor connected to a inverter, so when you turn on the inverter it would turn on the power to the motor causing the alternator to turn. Then by activating the voltage regulator on the alternator you should start making the battery recharge right? If so you should be able to connect a second motor at 13 amps which would then be connected to a generator. Using the 13 amp motor instead of the gas motor you should be able run the generator right?

The guys at the local car parts store saw that the first motor actually charges the battery while it is hooked up to the inverter and the alternator. The in verter should according to the voltometer they put on it shows it has an additional 45 amps, output so it stands to reason one more motor running less than the motor connected to the alternator should keep the battery charged for some time before having to change the battery. In the mean time you can have all the lights in the house connected to the generator. there for illiminating part of your electric bill due to the lights being powered that way.

Would this be right?

Sounds like the guys at the auto parts store are pulling your leg. If you want to power your house, just use a gas powered generator. Why all the extra stuff?
 
Ahhhhhh yet another trying to do perpetual motion
it comes up so often in so many forums
due to all the losses involved you can never generate as much or more power than what is being consumed in the system. The charging current to the battery from the generator will never keep up with the current drain from the battery as it powers the electric motor.

Its not going to take too long before the battery can no longer supply the current to drive the motor.

Dave
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top