Genetically Engineered Bacteria

  • Thread starter Thread starter kalladin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bacteria
AI Thread Summary
Genetic engineering of cyanobacteria to thrive in extreme climates and pressures is a theoretically feasible concept, often discussed in the context of terraforming. However, simply placing a jar of these engineered bacteria on an inhospitable planet may not suffice for successful proliferation. Key challenges include the need for additional resources beyond carbon dioxide and water, such as light for photosynthesis and suitable nutrients for growth. The discussion also seeks information on relevant articles or companies actively pursuing this research area.
kalladin
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
Would it be feasible to genetically engineer cyanobacteria so that they could exist in extreme climates and pressures? Then, could we make a jar full of them and throw it into some inhospitable planet that we believe have liquid water underneath its surface, so that the bacteria could proliferate and eventually oxygenize the environment?

K.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
This is theoretically doable I believe and has been much discussed under the rubric of terraforming. I don't think a typlical jar would be enough, and there are other problems (bacteria are living creatures, so they need food).
 
What food would cyanobacteria require other than the high CO2 atmosphere of the planet, and the water that is supposedly underneath the surface of the planet?

Also, does anybody know any websites or articles about this topic? Are there any companies that are actually trying to do this?

K.
 
well.. they would definitely need light!
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Back
Top