I've been meaning to ask this for some time, and now I've plucked up the courage! It is puzzling to me that many fundamental relationships in GR are explained in terms of euclidean space. Taking for example the geodesic deviation equation, it occurs to me that if defined in 3+1 spacetime there is at least the possibility that u, v or w could represent something non-causal. What is the basic argument for translating Riemannian concepts to pseudo-Reimannian situations? Is there a sense that we could bake causality into things like geodesic deviation, or is this a non-issue? I don't recall seeing this issue discussed in any of my other investigations . . .(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Geodesic deviation in spacetime, not just space

Tags:

Loading...

Similar Threads - Geodesic deviation spacetime | Date |
---|---|

I Geodesic deviation in static spacetime | Oct 28, 2017 |

I Schutz: question regarding geodesic deviation | Mar 21, 2017 |

Geodesic deviation in 2d | May 6, 2015 |

Quick one-line working on Geodesic Deviation Equation | Feb 28, 2015 |

Why no absolute derivative in this example of geodesic deviation? | Sep 8, 2014 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**