Geodesic Equations: Newtonian vs Einstein

  • Thread starter Thread starter GRstudent
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geodesics
GRstudent
Messages
143
Reaction score
1
\dfrac{d^2 x}{dt^2}=-\nabla \Phi

\dfrac{d^2 x^\mu}{d\tau^2}= -\Gamma^{\mu}_{\alpha \beta}{}\dfrac{dx^\alpha}{d\tau}\dfrac{dx^\beta}{d\tau}

These two equations, to be true, the way they are written should ring a bell. They are similar yet not identical. What is the meaning behind them?

I guess first is Newtonian; second, is Einstein.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Newtonian gravity can be represented using curved spacetime, so if that was the physics behind the equations, then both equations could be representing exactly the same thing.

However, the physical context of the second equation could be much more general than that of the first. For instance, the second equation could be used to define the great-circle course of a passenger jet from Europe to America.
 
For instance, the second equation could be used to define the great-circle course of a passenger jet from Europe to America.

Ok, nice! I will be flying soon from Germany to Houston, what inputs should I put into second equation?
 
See pages 76-77 of Wald's General Relativity.
The first equation, which describes the motion of a particle in the gravitational field phi, can be derived from the second, the geodesic equation for a point particle in a curved spacetime, in the Newtonian limit.
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top