Geodesics in Rindler Space: How Do They Differ from Minkowski Space?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PerpStudent
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geodesics Space
PerpStudent
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
How would one determine a geodesic in Rindler space? Why would geodesics not be simply the same as those of Minkowsky space? Is it not analogous to using polar vs. Cartesian coordinates in euclidean space, where a straight line is the same in either case?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PerpStudent said:
How would one determine a geodesic in Rindler space? Why would geodesics not be simply the same as those of Minkowsky space? Is it not analogous to using polar vs. Cartesian coordinates in euclidean space, where a straight line is the same in either case?

Hi Perp Student,

Yes, that is correct. The term "Rindler space" is actually a bit inaccurate since the spacetime being described is just the Minkowski vacuum - "Rindler coordinates" would be better.

Geodesics in Rinder coordinates are indeed the same as those of Minkowski space in the sense that they will appear as straight lines after performing a Rindler->Minkowski coordinate transformation. They will not, however, appear as straight lines in Rindler coordinates. The actual form of the geodesic equations here is quite complicated, but Wikipedia has a decent discussion.

"Rindler observers"; i.e. the worldlines of particles at rest in the Rindler frame, do not correspond to geodesics in Minkowski space. This is because Rindler coordinates describe a coordinate system which is undergoing uniform acceleration - such a coordinate system is not inertial, so the observers at rest in such a system do not undergo geodesic motion.
 
That's very helpful, thank you.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top