Geometric Distribution Question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the probability of achieving three heads in a row when tossing three fair coins, using the geometric distribution. The probability of success (three heads) is determined to be 1/8, which is denoted as θ. The user calculates the probability of success occurring on the third trial using the formula p(3) = (1/8)*(1-(1/8))^2, resulting in approximately 0.0957. Confirmation is given that the calculation method is correct, despite some uncertainty about the approach. The user expresses gratitude for the validation of their work.
James...
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An experiment consistion of tossing three fair coins is performed repeatedly and "success" is when all three show a head.

What is the probability that the success is on the third performance of the experiment?

Homework Equations



Geometric distribution equation

p(x) = \theta(1-\theta)\stackrel{(x-1)}{}

where \theta is the probability of success

The Attempt at a Solution



The probability of getting heads on a fair coin is 1/2

so the probability of 3 heads is 1/8 which is \theta

I'm assuming the third trial is when x=3 so

p(3) = (1/8)*(1-(1/8))^2

p(3) = 0.095703125...Am I correct in my working/method for this question?

Many thanks

James
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks fine to me!
 
Cheers! I know the actualy calculation is done right. Just wasn't completely sure if I'd used the right method.

I stupidly left the notes I did for the question at University and I'm revising now at home so can't check over them.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top