Geometric interpetation of a complex number in R^2

Valhalla
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
For this problem i am given two complex numbers Z_1 , Z_2 and then a third which is the sum of the first two complex numbers Z_3. I am then asked to find the geometric interpetation of these numbers in \mathbb{R}^2. I am fine when graphing them in the complex plane but unsure of what they look like in \mathbb{R}^2. Do I just take the real part and graph a point in the \mathbb{R}^2? If so how do I determine which axis it would be on? Do you think this might be a typo?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The standard "complex plane" is to plot the complex number a+ bi as the point (a, b). That is, the x-axis is the "real axis" and the y-axis is the "imaginary axis". It might occur to you that the sum of complex numbers, (a+ bi)+ (c+ di)= (a+c)+ (b+d)i looks a lot like (a+c, b+d), the sum of vectors. And that might lead you to think about a parallelogram.
 
HallsofIvy said:
The standard "complex plane" is to plot the complex number a+ bi as the point (a, b). That is, the x-axis is the "real axis" and the y-axis is the "imaginary axis". It might occur to you that the sum of complex numbers, (a+ bi)+ (c+ di)= (a+c)+ (b+d)i looks a lot like (a+c, b+d), the sum of vectors. And that might lead you to think about a parallelogram.


Yes, I understand that the complex numbers add like vectors. However, what I am confused about is that I thought that to graph them they needed to be in the complex plane. Like you said the x-axis is the real and the y-axis is the imaginary. When I look at the complex number (a+bi) and consider where that would be on R^2, I get confused.

So if I get what your saying then the complex number (a+bi) would just be the vector (a,b) in R^2? Am I overthinking this?
 
Yes, that's exactly what I am saying!
 
Ok I think I got it then. Thanks HallsofIvy!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top