Geometric Sequence; Arithmetic Sequence w/o 2,3,7

AI Thread Summary
The discussion covers several mathematical problems related to geometric and arithmetic sequences. For Problem 8, the values of x and y in the geometric sequence are found to be x = 2 and y = 4. Problem 9 presents an arithmetic sequence that avoids terms divisible by 2, 3, or 7, with an example being 5, 11, 17, 23, 29. In Problem 10, the first five terms of sequence A that also appear in sequence B are identified as 9, 16, 23, 30, and 37. Problem 11b explains that two different common ratios can occur if the given terms are not consecutive in the geometric sequence.
mustang
Messages
169
Reaction score
0
Problem 8.
Find x & y if the sequence 2y, 2xy, 2, xy/2,...is geometric.

Problem 9.
Find an arithmeitc sequence none of whose terms are divisible by 2, 3, or 7.

Prtoblem 10.
Consider two arithmetic sequences:
A:3, 14, 25.. B: 2, 9 , 16, ...
Write the first five terms of sequence A that are also terms of sequence B.

Problem 11b. Given two terms of a geometric sequence, under what conditions will there be two different common ratios that could be used to find two sequences that have the given terms?

Problem 16. Show that 1 + 2 + 4 +...+2^(n-1)=2^(n)-1
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yep, looks like Algebra 2 problems.
 


Problem 8. To find x and y, we can use the formula for a geometric sequence: a_n = a_1 * r^(n-1). In this case, a_1 = 2y and a_2 = 2xy, so we have 2xy = (2y) * r. Similarly, a_3 = 2 and a_4 = xy/2, giving us xy/2 = 2 * r^2. Solving these equations simultaneously, we get x = 2 and y = 4.

Problem 9. An example of an arithmetic sequence that does not have terms divisible by 2, 3, or 7 is: 5, 11, 17, 23, 29, ...

Problem 10. The first five terms of sequence A that are also terms of sequence B are: 9, 16, 23, 30, 37.

Problem 11b. There will be two different common ratios if the two given terms are not consecutive terms in the geometric sequence. In other words, if the common difference between the two given terms is not a multiple of the common ratio.

Problem 16. We can use mathematical induction to prove this statement.
Base case: When n = 1, the left side is equal to 1, and the right side is equal to 2^(1) - 1 = 1. So the statement holds true for n = 1.
Inductive step: Assume the statement holds true for n = k, i.e. 1 + 2 + 4 + ... + 2^(k-1) = 2^(k) - 1.
For n = k+1, we have 1 + 2 + 4 + ... + 2^(k-1) + 2^(k) = 2^(k+1) - 1.
Adding 2^(k) on both sides, we get 1 + 2 + 4 + ... + 2^(k-1) + 2^(k) + 2^(k) = 2^(k+1) - 1 + 2^(k).
Simplifying, we get 1 + 2 + 4 + ... + 2^(k) + 2^(k) = 2^(k+1) -
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...

Similar threads

Back
Top