Geometry: Minimum Length Shape to Enclose 4 Circles (R=1)

  • Thread starter Thread starter tongos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geometry
AI Thread Summary
The minimum length of a shape needed to enclose four circles, each with a radius of one, is calculated based on their arrangement. When the circles are arranged so that each is tangent to two others, their centers form a rectangle with sides of length 2, leading to a circumscribing circle with a diameter of 2 + 2√2. The radius of this circle is 1 + √2, resulting in a length of 2π(1 + √2). Alternatively, if considering a shape with rounded edges, the total length around the four circles is 8 + 2π. This analysis provides insights into geometric arrangements and their implications for enclosing shapes.
tongos
Messages
84
Reaction score
0
what is the minimum length of a shape needed to enclose 4 circles, each with a radius of one?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
How are the circles spaced? Can they overlap at all?
 
Assuming you have all four circles abutting, so that each is tangent to two others, their centers form a rectangle with sides of length 2. The distance between the centers of diagonally opposite circles is 2√(2). The distance along that diagonal, extended, from the center of such a circle to the outer edge of its circle is, of course, 1 so the distance along that diagonal, from the outer edge of one circle to the outer edge of the other is 2+ 2&radic(2) and that is the diameter of the circle circumscribing all 4. It's radius is 1+ &radic(2). That would have length 2π(1+ √(2)).

If you are only concerned about a "shape" that includes all four circles, you have a square with "rounded eges". The straight portion of each has length 2 (and there are 4 of those). The rounded portion is a quarter of each circle: length (1/4)(2π)= π/2 and there are four of those: the total length around the four circles is
8+ 2π.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top