Geometry of Time Dilation

mcjosep
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
I was recently exploring time dilation from Gravity and from velocity and I came up with an interesting derivation that I have not seen before. I was wondering if there is a paper published showing these relationships like this before and where I could find it?

First you start with the gravitational time dilation formula where:

$$
T_1=Tsqrt(1-((2GM)/rc^2))
$$

and rather than entering r for the radius we replace r with the Schwarzschild radius formula ##((2GM)/C^2)x##
with an ##x## at the end representing how many Schwarzschild radii you are away from the center. This brings the formula to look like:

$$
T_1=Tsqrt(1-(2GM)/((((2GM)/c^2)x)c^2))
$$

Which when simplified breaks down to:

$$
T_1=Tsqrt(1-1/x)
$$

and if you make ##T=1## then you just get

$$
=sqrt(1-1/x)
$$

This is very similar to the one in many physics books ##=sqrt(1-r_0/r)## where ##r_0## is equal to the Schwarzschild radius and then r equals the radius from the center. The formula above it just makes it slightly simpler due to making ##r_0## equal to 1 and x equal to how many radii a point you are observing is from the center of the mass.

That is the gravitational time dilation side portion of this relationship. Now for the Velocity time dilation side we use a similar methodology and start with:

$$
T_0=Tsqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
$$

Now we make ##T## equal to 1, ##v## equal to 1, and ##c## to ##y## because now we are going to make ##c## a variable.

$$
T_0=sqrt(1-1/y^2)
$$

What you see now "##1/y^2##" is showing the velocity as a constant 1 and ##y## represents how much faster light is going than the velocity constant of 1. If the above were to show the fraction as ##1/5^2## then this would be the same as saying an object is going at a velocity 1/5th the velocity of light.
So now if we solve the velocity and gravitational time dilation formulas so that we can see how they dilate time to come up with the same result:

$$
sqrt(1-1/x)=sqrt(1-1/y^2)
$$

We can simplify this to

$$
x=y^2
$$

So let's say your radius from the center of the mass ##x## is equal to 4 Schwarzschild radii then the speed an object must move to get the same dilation due to velocity must be equal to half the speed of light since ##y## equals 2 and represents the speed of light going two times faster than the moving object.

I was pretty happy to see a seemingly simple yet complex set of formulas breakdown into one of the simplest algebraic formulas.

This can also be constructed geometrically as seen below:

[1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/nSC7Y.jpg

The edge of the black circle represents the Schwarzschild radius and each point on the x-axis is another radii away from the center. The Y axis has points that are the square root of x.

Let me know what you think. Please check my math.

You can use the same methodology to break down other formulas as well.
Circular Orbit Velocity
$$
v=sqrt((GM)/r)
$$
Then add in the Schwarzschild radius formula for ##r## and get
$$
v=sqrt((GM)/(((2GM)/c^2)x)
$$
Which then simplifies to
$$
c/(sqrt(2)*sqrt(x))
$$
and again you can replace ##c## with 1 and now the formula will split out what percent the speed of light you are going.

This also works with orbital energy:
$$
E=c^2/4x
$$

Critical or escape velocity:

$$
v=c/sqrt(x)
$$

and that formula comes out with the same answer as ##y## in ##x=y^2## from the formulas above.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mcjosep said:
Please check my math.
There are a few mistakes.
mcjosep said:
we are going to make c a variable
c is a constant, not a variable.
mcjosep said:
So now if we solve the velocity and gravitational time dilation formulas so that we can see how they dilate time to come up with the same result:
You cannot set those two equations equal to each other since they cannot both be valid equations at the same time.
mcjosep said:
you can replace c with 1
You cannot do that since you already set v to 1 and v<c.
 
well you can make C a "variable" when the changing number still represents c. Its just a different way of looking at the formula.

and per your "cannot since you already set v to 1 and v<c" comment. I actually took v out of the question and replaced it with % of c.

You cannot have gravitational time dilation and time dilation from velocity at the same time?
 
mcjosep said:
You cannot have gravitational time dilation and time dilation from velocity at the same time?
Sure you can, but not using those formulas. The first formula applies to a clock which is stationary in the standard coordinates in Schwarzschild spacetime. The second formula applies to a clock which is moving in the standard coordinates in Minkowski spacetime.

If you want to consider both together then you need a formula which applies to a clock which is moving in Schwarzschild spacetime. See here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_dilation#Time_dilation_due_to_gravitation_and_motion_together
 
Thats interesting that they do not work together yet the critical escape velocity formula works using the same logic from that derivative of x=y^2
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top