Geometry-Sequences with unlimited repeated values

  • Thread starter Thread starter thomasrules
  • Start date Start date
thomasrules
Messages
243
Reaction score
0
Here is the question I cannot get it...

In a series of license plates, the first three symbols are any of the 26 letters in the alphabet and the last three are any of the 10 digits from 0 to 9.

How many plates can be formed in which at least one symbol is repeated?
-

--------I know that 26^3x10^3 is the total possible combinations.
I thought that you would do this: (26^3-25^3)x(10^3-9^3)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You want to know how many plates can be formed with at least one repeated symbol. Have you considered the negation? I.e. how many plates can be formed with at most zero repeated symbols?
 
I think the expression "unlimited repeated values" simply means that you can use any letter or digit more than once so your first expression would be correct.
 
Practical caveat. NY current plate has four digits (not three), but the first digit cannot be 0. In addition the letters I and O appear to have been omitted deliberately, looking too much like 1 and 0.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top