Geostationary Orbit: Why Equatorial Plane?

AI Thread Summary
Geostationary orbits must be positioned in the equatorial plane to maintain a fixed position relative to the Earth's surface. If an object were placed in a geostationary orbit outside the equatorial plane, it would oscillate between the northern and southern hemispheres. While a geosynchronous orbit can exist at different inclinations, only an equatorial orbit can achieve true geostationarity. The mechanics of orbiting around the Earth's center of gravity dictate that any deviation from the equator results in a necessary passage over varying latitudes. Therefore, maintaining an equatorial position is essential for an object to remain geostationary.
darkar
Messages
187
Reaction score
0
Why must geostationary orbit at the equatorial plane?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Any object which is geostationary doesn't move relative to the surface.

If it isn't in the equatorial plane, it will oscillate between being in the northern and southern hemispheres.

It could be geosynchronous and be in another inclination, but not geostationary.
 
Because a geostationary orbit, like any orbit, revolves around the center of gravity. If an object is above the Earth at the proper altitude for geostationary orbit, but it is North of the Equator (let's say 10 degrees, for this example), you can draw a line from the object through the surface of the Earth to the Earth's center. If you extend this line so it reaches the surface of the Earth once again, on the far side, it will exit the Earth at 10 degrees of southern latitude. The object in orbit must pass directly over this point at some time.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This hypothesis of scientists about the origin of the mysterious signal WOW seems plausible only on a superficial examination. In fact, such a strong coherent radiation requires a powerful initiating factor, and the hydrogen atoms in the cloud themselves must be in an overexcited state in order to respond instantly. If the density of the initiating radiation is insufficient, then the atoms of the cloud will not receive it at once, some will receive it earlier, and some later. But then there...

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
36
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top