Get Physics Help: Big Bang Explained

AI Thread Summary
The Big Bang occurred not in a specific location but throughout the entire universe, which was once a singularity. This expansion involved the rapid growth of space itself rather than an explosion of matter into empty space. The idea of multiple Big Bangs outside our universe remains speculative and is not part of the mainstream understanding. Clarifying this misconception is essential for grasping the fundamentals of Big Bang theory. Understanding that the Big Bang represents the expansion of all space can reshape one's view of the universe.
jfh_dragonfly
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
This is going to sound like a really stupid question, and I hope the atmosphere here isn’t so rarified that it will bother anyone, but if it does, I apologize in advance.

I heard recently that the Big Bang didn’t happen all in one place. If that’s true, my universe-view has been skewed. Can anyone explain?

Thanks!
- Dragonfly
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The big bang, as we know it, happened in one place, which was the entire universe at that time. There are theories which talk about other big bangs, outside our universe, but this is purely speculative.
 
Yes another way of putting it is to say that the Big Bang happened at every place as every place was just one place in the original 'singularity'.

Garth
 
Welcome to Physics Forums, jfh_dragonfly!
Questions from beginners or experts are welcome here!

You've hit on a key misconception of Big Bang theory. It was not an explosion of stuff into empty space. It was the rapid expansion of all space. See also my recent description here...
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=52659
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This hypothesis of scientists about the origin of the mysterious signal WOW seems plausible only on a superficial examination. In fact, such a strong coherent radiation requires a powerful initiating factor, and the hydrogen atoms in the cloud themselves must be in an overexcited state in order to respond instantly. If the density of the initiating radiation is insufficient, then the atoms of the cloud will not receive it at once, some will receive it earlier, and some later. But then there...
Back
Top