Getting the joint probability density for the characteristic equation

schrodingerscat11
Messages
86
Reaction score
1
Dear all,

Greetings! I was given a problem from Reichl's Statistical Physics book. Thank you very much for taking time to read my post.

Homework Statement



The stochastic variables X and Y are independent and Gaussian distributed with
first moment <x> = <y> = 0 and standard deviation σx = σy = 1. Find the characteristic function
for the random variable Z = X2+Y2, and compute the moments <z>, <z2> and <z3>. Find the first 3 cumulants.

Homework Equations


Characteristic equation: f_z (k) = &lt;e^{ikz}&gt; = \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} e^{ikz}\, P_z (z) dz

Joint Probability density: P_z(z) = \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} dx \, \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} dy \, δ (z - G(x,y)) P_{x,y}(x,y) where z = G (x, y)

Also, P_{x,y} = P_x (x) \, P_y (y) for independent stochastic variables x and y.

For Gaussian distribution: P_x = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2∏} } e^{\frac{-x^2}{2}}

The Attempt at a Solution


To get the characteristic equation, we need first to get the joint probability density Pz(z):

Since G(x,y)= x^2 +y^2 and P_{x,y} = P_x (x) \, P_y (y)

P_z(z) = \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} dx \, \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} dy \, δ (z - x^2 +y^2) P_x (x) P_y (y)

P_z(z) = \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}P_x (x) \, dx \, \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}P_y (y) \, dy \, δ (z - x^2 +y^2)

P_z(z) = \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2∏} } e^{\frac{-x^2}{2}} \, dx \, \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2∏} } e^{\frac{-y^2}{2}} \, dy \, δ (z - x^2 +y^2)

P_z(z) = \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2∏} } e^{\frac{-x^2}{2}} \, dx \, \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2∏} } e^{\frac{-1}{2}(z-x^2)} \, dy \, δ (z - x^2 +y^2)

P_z(z) = \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2∏} } e^{\frac{-1}{2}(x^2+z-x^2)} \, dx \, \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2∏} } dy \, δ (z - x^2 +y^2)

P_z(z) = \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2∏} } e^{\frac{-1}{2}z} \, dx \, \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2∏} } dy \, δ (z - x^2 +y^2)

P_z(z) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2∏} } e^{\frac{-1}{2}z} \,\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} dx \, \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2∏} } dy \, δ (z - x^2 +y^2)

Question: How do I simplify this factor \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} dx \, \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2∏} } dy \, δ (z - x^2 +y^2) ?

Thank you very much for your help! :biggrin:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi physicsjn! :smile:
physicsjn said:
Question: How do I simplify this factor \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} dx \, \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2π} } dy \, δ (z - x^2 +y^2) ?

change to ∫∫ rdrdθ, and then it's just δ(z - r2) :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Are the integration limits correct?

Thank you tiny-tim! :biggrin: So I guess this will become
\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}dx \,dy \, \delta(z-x^2-y^2) = \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}\int^{2\pi}_{0} r \, dr \, d\theta \, \delta(z-r^2)

= 2\pi\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty} r \, dr \, \, \delta(z-r^2)

= 2\pi \, \frac{r^2}{2} \, \delta(z-r^2)\,|^{+\infty}_{-\infty}

= \pi \, r^2 \, \delta(z-r^2)\,|^{+\infty}_{-\infty}

Now, because of the delta term, all other r will be killed except when r2=z,

leaving us with

\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}dx \,dy \, \delta(z-x^2-y^2) = \pi \, z

Is this correct? :shy: Thanks again.. :)
 
hi physicsjn! :smile:

(just got up :zzz:)

i] ##\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}\int^{2\pi}_{0}## covers the plane twice, doesn't it? :wink:

ii]
physicsjn said:
= 2\pi\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty} r \, dr \, \, \delta(z-r^2)

= 2\pi \, \frac{r^2}{2} \, \delta(z-r^2)\,|^{+\infty}_{-\infty}

i don't follow what you're doing here :confused:

i'd say (for z > 0) ∫0 r δ(z - r2) dr

= ∫0 1/2 δ(z - u) du

= 1/2

(not sure that works for z = 0 :confused:)
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thank you tiny-tim! :biggrin:

i]
Ahhh... I see... My limits should be
\int^{+\infty}_{0} \int^{2\pi}_{0}

And solving with this new limits should yield
\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty} \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty} dx \, dy \, δ(z-x^2-y^2)=\int^{+\infty}_{0} \int^{2\pi}_{0}r \, dr \, d\theta \, δ(z-r^2)

=2\pi\int^{+\infty}_{0} r \, dr \,δ(z-r^2)

ii]
I'm really sorry. The second line =2\pi\frac{r^2}{2}\delta(z-r^2) |_{-\infty}^{+\infty}<br />is wrong. Just forget that I have written it. :redface:

But here's what I'm trying to say:
We want to evaluate 2\pi\int^{+\infty}_{0} r \, dr \,δ(z-r^2)
In my mind, I picture this integral as a sum of all the possible r values from 0 to infinity. However, the delta factor is zero everywhere except when r^2=z or when r=\sqrt{z}. In this case the delta function is just equal to one.
Hence, despite the integral being an infinite sum of r's, only one term will survive:r=\sqrt{z}. The rest of the terms are just zeroes because of delta function.
So I thought \int^{+\infty}_{0} r \, dr \,δ(z-r^2)=\sqrt{z}
It's similar to the what I remember as Fourier's trick. But I guess using your relation below makes things simpler, so just forget this Fourier's trick stuff. :smile:

[iii]
Wow! I totally don't know this. :bugeye: Thank you very much for this! :biggrin: I tried to show this in my to-be-submitted solution. I let u=r2 and solved for du and found \frac{du}{2}=r \, dr. I can't see though why it shouldn't work for z=0. :confused: I'll just assume it'll work. :wink:

I think from here the rest is just plug and chug. Thank you so much tiny-tim for helping me! :biggrin: Sorry if I'm a bit slow. :redface:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top