Getting the Potential Energy from a Conservative Force

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining whether a given force, F = k(x, 2y, 3z), is conservative and finding its potential energy. It is established that the force is conservative since the curl is zero. The user expresses confusion about setting up the integral for potential energy and how to handle the integration variables. After some back and forth, it is clarified that the potential energy can be expressed as U = -k[(1/2)x² + y² + (3/2)z²], with the understanding that only one arbitrary constant is needed for the entire expression. The conversation concludes with the user feeling confident about completing the problem.
Trade
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The problem basically asked me to check if a given force was conservative and if it was conservative, also find the potential energy.

F = k(x,2y,3z)

Homework Equations



(\nabla X F) = Curl of F
U = Integral of F

3. attempt

So the force is clearly conservative as the curl is equal to zero. I know that I basically need to take the integral of the force, but I'm a bit confused as to how to set up an integral given how the force was given, or even what to integrate with respect to. Any point in the right direction would be awesome. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Set it up as a partial DE that you have to solve.

$$\vec{F}=-\vec{\nabla} U$$
 
Simon Bridge said:
Set it up as a partial DE that you have to solve.

$$\vec{F}=-\vec{\nabla} U$$
Okay, so I end up with something along the lines of...

K [x, 2y, 3z] = - [dU/dx, dU/dy, dU/dz]

and then we integrate

U = -k [ (1/2)x2, y2,(3/2)z2]
Would it be proper to add a constant at the end of each part, noting that it's terms of the other two variables? Something like

U = -k [ (1/2)x2 + Cy,z, y2 + Cx,z , (3/2)z2 + Cx,y]EDIT:

I think I'm being silly. I should just put all the components together right? So that the other components are the Constant for each other right? So it looks like

U = -k [ (1/2)x2 + y2+ (3/2)z2 ]
 
Last edited:
You should end up with just one arbitrary constant.

i.e. You need to evaluate cy,z etc.
That means solving as simultaneous equations or go back and solve the DEs one at a time instead of all in one go.

##F_x=kx=-\frac{\partial}{\partial x}U(x,y,z)\\ \qquad \Rightarrow U(x,y,z)=-\frac{1}{2}kx^2+c(y,z)##

... i.e. c(y,z) is a function of y and z alone.

##F_y = 2ky=-\frac{\partial}{\partial y}U(x,y,z) = -\frac{\partial}{\partial y}\big(-\frac{1}{2}kx^2+c(y,z)\big) = -\frac{\partial}{\partial y}c(y,z)\\ \qquad \Rightarrow c(y,z)=\cdots +d(z) \\ \qquad \qquad \Rightarrow U(x,y,z)=\cdots##

... you should be able to complete it from here.
 
Awesome, I think I have it from here. Thanks.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top