Getting the Potential Energy from a Conservative Force

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining whether a given force, F = k(x, 2y, 3z), is conservative and finding its potential energy. It is established that the force is conservative since the curl is zero. The user expresses confusion about setting up the integral for potential energy and how to handle the integration variables. After some back and forth, it is clarified that the potential energy can be expressed as U = -k[(1/2)x² + y² + (3/2)z²], with the understanding that only one arbitrary constant is needed for the entire expression. The conversation concludes with the user feeling confident about completing the problem.
Trade
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The problem basically asked me to check if a given force was conservative and if it was conservative, also find the potential energy.

F = k(x,2y,3z)

Homework Equations



(\nabla X F) = Curl of F
U = Integral of F

3. attempt

So the force is clearly conservative as the curl is equal to zero. I know that I basically need to take the integral of the force, but I'm a bit confused as to how to set up an integral given how the force was given, or even what to integrate with respect to. Any point in the right direction would be awesome. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Set it up as a partial DE that you have to solve.

$$\vec{F}=-\vec{\nabla} U$$
 
Simon Bridge said:
Set it up as a partial DE that you have to solve.

$$\vec{F}=-\vec{\nabla} U$$
Okay, so I end up with something along the lines of...

K [x, 2y, 3z] = - [dU/dx, dU/dy, dU/dz]

and then we integrate

U = -k [ (1/2)x2, y2,(3/2)z2]
Would it be proper to add a constant at the end of each part, noting that it's terms of the other two variables? Something like

U = -k [ (1/2)x2 + Cy,z, y2 + Cx,z , (3/2)z2 + Cx,y]EDIT:

I think I'm being silly. I should just put all the components together right? So that the other components are the Constant for each other right? So it looks like

U = -k [ (1/2)x2 + y2+ (3/2)z2 ]
 
Last edited:
You should end up with just one arbitrary constant.

i.e. You need to evaluate cy,z etc.
That means solving as simultaneous equations or go back and solve the DEs one at a time instead of all in one go.

##F_x=kx=-\frac{\partial}{\partial x}U(x,y,z)\\ \qquad \Rightarrow U(x,y,z)=-\frac{1}{2}kx^2+c(y,z)##

... i.e. c(y,z) is a function of y and z alone.

##F_y = 2ky=-\frac{\partial}{\partial y}U(x,y,z) = -\frac{\partial}{\partial y}\big(-\frac{1}{2}kx^2+c(y,z)\big) = -\frac{\partial}{\partial y}c(y,z)\\ \qquad \Rightarrow c(y,z)=\cdots +d(z) \\ \qquad \qquad \Rightarrow U(x,y,z)=\cdots##

... you should be able to complete it from here.
 
Awesome, I think I have it from here. Thanks.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top