Getting to space without rockets

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mfo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rockets Space
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around alternative methods for reaching space without traditional rocket propulsion, specifically exploring the use of balloons, spacecraft, and innovative concepts like tethers and hybrid propulsion systems. Participants examine the feasibility of these ideas in the context of physics and engineering challenges.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes using a combination of balloons and spacecraft to reach orbit, suggesting that balloons could reduce air resistance at high altitudes, but questions how to achieve the necessary escape velocity.
  • Another participant argues that slingshotting a spacecraft back into the atmosphere for a pickup is impractical due to high speeds and atmospheric re-entry challenges.
  • Some participants mention the concept of using tethers, such as geostationary tethers, to facilitate payload attachment at peak altitudes, which could be more energetically efficient.
  • A participant references ongoing work by JP Aerospace on an "Airship to Orbit" concept that combines ion and hybrid rocket motors, raising questions about the feasibility of sustaining hybrid propulsion for extended periods.
  • Concerns are raised about the physical principles governing balloon flight, particularly the relationship between air density and altitude, and the challenges of heating air within a balloon to achieve sufficient lift.
  • Another participant expresses skepticism about the JP Aerospace project, suggesting that advancements in materials and structures could lead to more practical solutions than balloon-based systems.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus, with multiple competing views on the practicality and feasibility of using balloons, tethers, and hybrid propulsion systems to reach space. Various challenges and limitations are highlighted without resolution.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations related to the efficiency of heating air in balloons, the challenges of high-speed pickups from lunar slingshots, and the ambitious nature of proposed concepts like the JP Aerospace project. These factors contribute to the ongoing uncertainty in the discussion.

Mfo
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,
Wacky idea,
Could we use a combination of balloons and spacecraft to place objects into orbit?

A balloon could be used to attain altitude and reduce air resistance but the problem faced is that we need to reach a high velocity to escape the Earth's gravitational field. The problem is velocity, a source of velocity is needed to impart on our platform at a high altitude.
Could we use something from space to impart the velocity to our object?

Why can't we use the moons slingshot to impart a large increase in velocity on any spacecraft which can then be used to pick up our platform at a high altitude and give it the necessary escape velocity?

This piggy back craft could be re used and slingshot around the moon again to increase the velocity for another.

Is this a stupid idea?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The idea of lifting stuff into orbit has lots of appeal, but slingshotting a spacecraft down into the atmosphere to pick up an object seems impractical. The maximum altitude of balloons is about 20-25miles, still well within the atmosphere, so the pickup vehicle would be wrapped in plasma from air friction, which makes it tough for it to find the target or to steer to it. Even more difficult, an object coming back from the moon would be moving at about 25,000 mph at the time of encounter, which makes for a very jerky pickup.
There has been some conceptual designs involving tethers (think space elevator) that involve geostationary tethers that dangle down into the upper atmosphere. The idea is that a rocket payload can be attached as the rocket is reaching its peak altitude, when there is minimal relative motion between the payload and the tether.
It is energetically much cheaper to just reach an altitude than to also speed up to orbital velocity.
 
There's work being done on an "Airship to Orbit" in Rancho Cordova, California by a group called JP Aerospace. They are planning on using a ion/hybrid rocket motor mashup to provide propulsion. If it works, it'd be a quantum leap in capability. MY only question is how they intend to run a hybrid motor at any power level for the 5 days they estimate it would take to make the orbital insertion. A small liquid fuel rocket? Sure, just use a highly reliable fuel pump and a large fuel supply. The hybrid motor's got me scratching my head over how they plan on getting the required endurance.

There's a LOT of ideas on how to make it to orbit without a rocket; it's just that the cost is usually higher than the cost of continuing the existing "legacy" technology of expendable launch vehicles. If someone can come up with a way to break that cycle, the aerospace industry will beat a highway to their door. :)
 
Why your idea of balloons wouldn't work is because the physical property that makes a balloon go up in the air is density. So the density of the system you are trying to float up through the atmosphere must simply be lower than that of the atmosphere. It wouldn't work because the air density decreases with altitude. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...omparison_US_standard_atmosphere_1962.svg.png

and second because most probably a system that we are interested in putting in the atmosphere is surely denser.
Now what they do is heat the air inside the balloon to reach a lower density. but if we want to reach the stratosphere for example, the amount of heat you would have to add to the air control volume in your balloon wouldn't seem so efficient I suppose, in addition to having to find a material to withstand a high temperature.
 
The JP Aerospace concept seems ambitious in the extreme, think of a vehicle bigger than the Disney Magic cruise ship, much much lighter than air and driven to hypersonic speed at 200-400,000 ft altitude. Truly a project to push the state of the art for materials and structures, not to mention propulsion. My guess is that that kind of material would make a conventional reusable single stage to orbit vehicle quite practical, bypassing the need for balloons.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
13K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K