Given a random number from 0-3, return a random number from 0-6

gsingh2011
Messages
115
Reaction score
1
This is actually for a program, but the challenging part is really the math. So you're given a number 0, 1, 2, or 3 and the probability of getting each is the same. Now given this random number, I need to output a number 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 but the probability of getting each number needs to be the same.

Can anyone point me in the right direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
gsingh2011 said:
This is actually for a program, but the challenging part is really the math. So you're given a number 0, 1, 2, or 3 and the probability of getting each is the same. Now given this random number, I need to output a number 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 but the probability of getting each number needs to be the same.

Can anyone point me in the right direction?

You need to specify how the outcome of the first round will affect the second round. Otherwise you just have two independent outcomes a,b. Then the probability of any pair is 1/28.
 
Last edited:
SW VandeCarr said:
You need to specify how the outcome of the first round will affect the second round. Otherwise you just have two independent outcomes a,b. Then the probability of any pair is 1/28.

Well the relationship is that after being given this random number from 0-3, you need to perform mathematical operations (functions such as floor and ceiling are allowed) to arrive at a new number from 0-6. Now if you performed these same steps for the random input number many times, you would end up with the numbers from 0-6 an approximately equal number of times (probability of getting each number is the same). Does that clarify the problem?
 
MisterX said:
These functions are for use with non-integer numbers.
I thought division might be involved, resulting in non-integers.

However, if the output needn't be random, but only uniform
What's the difference? I thought if something was random, the probability for each result would be the same (uniform).

You could do something like generate a second 0-3 integer pseudorandomly and determine the 0-6 integer using the two integers. You could have the program do something somewhat similar if you are able to get two 0-3 random integers.
I'll try it out, see if I can come up with anything.

If anyone else has any other ideas, please share them.

EDIT: Seems like the person above me deleted their post, making me seem crazy.
 
Last edited:
You can randomize 0,1,2,3 twice to randomly express any number from 0 through 15 in base 4. Keep doing that till you get a number in the desired range. This procedure is not guaranteed to terminate, but each of 0 through 6 have the same probability of being chosen. Just a thought.
 
gsingh2011 said:
I thought division might be involved, resulting in non-integers.
.

Suppose x is a random integer from 0-3.

Suppose the program performs something such as floor(f(x)). Where f is a function by the mathematical definition of a function.

We may get from this, a maximum of four unique outcomes, which is what we started with (four values of x). But we may actually end up with less.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top