Given positive interger N, now many non-decreasing sequences of length

Dragonfall
Messages
1,023
Reaction score
5
Given positive interger N, now many non-decreasing sequences of length N are there whose entries are less than N?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


are the entries positive integers?
 
Yes .
 


This isn't in the homework section so I'm assuming it isn't homework.

Let A be the set of sequences of the type in the post.
Let B be the set of sequences of N+1 non-negative integers with sum N-2.
A and B are in bijection by associating a sequence a_1,a_2, \ldots ,a_N of A to b_1,b_2,\ldots,b_{N+1} defined by b_i = a_i - a_{i-1} where we let a_0 = 1, a_{N+1}=N. The inverse is given by associating a sequence b_1,b_2,\ldots,b_{N+1} of B to a_1,\ldots,a_N defined by a_{i+1} = a_{i}+b_{i+1} where we let a_0 = 1.

Thus we can just count B which has
\binom{(N+1)+(N-2)-1}{(N+1)-1} = \binom{2N-2}{N}
elements.
 


Wow I would never have thought of that. Thanks. Unfortunately it grows too fast for my purposes.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top