Global U(1) invariant of Dirac Lagrangian

metroplex021
Messages
148
Reaction score
0
Does anybody know what interpretation the invariant corresponding to the global U(1) invariance of the Dirac Lagrangian is? I have always had it in my head that it's charge, but then I realized that uncharged free particles such as neutrinos satisfy this equation too! Any thoughts much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Depends on the specifics of your lagrangian. Think lepton number, baryon number, B-L, etc.
 
Requiring the Hamiltonian to be hermitian can break this symmetry. Uncharged particles usually have a Lagrangian that looks something like \mathcal{L} = \frac{1}{2}\partial_u\phi\partial^u\phi - \frac{1}{2}\mu^2\phi^2. In that case, the hermiticity of H forces \phi to be real, so there is no U(1) symmetry anymore. Was that what you meant, or did you have a specific Lagrangian in mind?
 
Last edited:
Well, I just had in mind the Dirac lagrangian. It seems that neutrinos have mass, and if so should presumably obey this equation. But if so, what does the U(1) symmetry correspond to, given that these guys aren't charged? Thanks for your replies!
 
If you just have neutrinos, it would be neutrino number. If you have something like a standard model lagrangian, it would be lepton number and baryon number (two separate U(1)s)
 
Massive neutrinos with a "Majorana mass" are not described by the Dirac lagrangian. See e.g. Srednicki's text for details.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top