Global Warming alarming species demise

AI Thread Summary
Research indicates that global warming could lead to the extinction of up to 50% of all species within the next 30-40 years, a claim that has sparked debate over its validity. Some argue that this projection seems exaggerated, especially when compared to historical extinction events like the Permian Mass Extinction, which saw up to 90% of marine species disappear. The discussion highlights the complexity of extinction rates, suggesting that while climate change is a significant factor, human activities also play a crucial role in species decline. The potential for drastic changes in species diversity due to slight temperature increases raises concerns about ecosystem stability. Participants speculate on which species might go extinct first and the implications for evolution and ecological balance, with some expressing a tongue-in-cheek disdain for certain species, like disease-carrying mosquitoes. Overall, the conversation reflects a mix of skepticism and concern regarding the future of biodiversity in the face of climate change.
SF
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0108-06.htm

An Unnatural Disaster: Global Warming to Kill Off 1 Million Species
Scientists Shocked by Results of Research; 1 in 10 animals and plants extinct by 2050
Is it just me, or those studies show results that are extremely blown out of proportion?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Biology news on Phys.org
SF said:
Is it just me, or those studies show results that are extremely blown out of proportion?
What eactly do you mean "blown out of proportion"?
 
The study sais that up to 50% of all species could be driven to extinction in the next 30-40 years due to global warming.

50% of all species dying, due to a difference of a few degrees is to me "blown out of proportions".
 
The Permian Mass Extinction saw as much as 90% of marine species go extinct. From that point of view, a 50% extinction is possible from a temperature rise. Whether it will happen or not is speculation.

Interestingly, there are papers that posit part of the Permian Mass Extinction to extremely hot temperatures on earth. End of the Permian is the hottest period on record after the start of multicellular life forms.

Anyway, the folks talking about mass extinction from rising temperatures are getting some ammunition from the Permian data. IMO.

I'm staying out of the climatological debate and presenting what the fossil record shows. I can't say what will or will not happen in the next 50 years.
 
I don't think it's unrealistic, but I think the data may be merging other factors into the equation for the total extinction rate. There has been a fairly steady rise in extinction usually blamed on "human interference" which probably accounts for a lot of the extinction that would be included in the global warming caused extinction.

But even things such as species diversity are showing some drastic changes with the small increases in annual temperature. Small changes in diversity can destroy the stability of many ecosystems and can lead to a lot of problems.
 
Good news SF, keep healthy, and if you are not too old, you will know the answer to your question in ~ 44 years. I wonder what 50% of species will go first, and if this action will open new niches for rapid evolution to fill the void ? Or, do we just end with 50% less species. An interesting natural experiment about to unfold that many that read PF will be able to observe. Should we start a pet list of those species we hope will be first to go--I find little use for the mosquito species, especially those that cause human disease.
 
Rade said:
I find little use for the mosquito species, especially those that cause human disease.

If the anthropocentric basis for global warming is true then all hail the mosquitos and the diseases they spread!:-p
 
Back
Top