Global warming and solar actvities

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the causes of global warming, specifically debating the roles of pollution versus solar activity. The IPCC asserts that solar activity has a minimal impact compared to CO2 emissions from human activities. Some participants argue that variations in solar output could significantly influence Earth's temperature, citing observations of warming on other planets as supporting evidence. However, this view is controversial and largely disputed, with many believing human activity is the primary driver of climate change. The conversation reflects ongoing uncertainty and differing opinions on the factors contributing to global warming.
slidingbabies
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I am new here, and I have a question about the Global warming.
do you think the global warming is caused mostly by pollution or solar activities of our sun ?!

cheers
-Amir
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Controversial issue this. Ask the IPCC they will say absolutely not, solar activity only plays a very minor role compared to CO2. I've always thought that the variation in the suns output must play a more significant role than they are letting on, as the sun is the only mechanism that heats up the Earth in the first place. And there has been a few observations of global warming on other planets in the solar system that i have collected before, as they seemed an interesting observation;

http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/pluto_warming_021009.html
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/060504_red_jr.html
http://www.tmgnow.com/repository/solar/lassen1.html
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/02/070228-mars-warming.html
http://www.scienceagogo.com/news/19980526052143data_trunc_sys.shtml
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/mai...18.xml&sSheet=/news/2004/07/18/ixnewstop.html
http://www.lubbockonline.com/news/092897/study.htm
http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/3434This is however holtly disputed, most people think that it is purely due to human activity. I'm still undecided.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is still in doubt. In the Little Ice Age, the Sun was in tired condition then the Earth was very cold at the time.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
79
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Back
Top