Solving the Tricky 3cos(x) + sin(x) - 1 Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter wasteofo2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trig
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around solving the trigonometric equation 3cos(x) + sin(x) - 1 for positive values of x within the range of 0 to 360 degrees. The original poster struggled with the problem despite knowing the necessary equations and attempted to graph the function to find the x-intercept, but their results were incorrect. A suggested approach involves using the identity cos(x) = sqrt(1 - sin²(x)) to set up a quadratic equation in terms of cos(x) and then solving it while ensuring the solutions satisfy the Pythagorean identity. Another method proposed is to use parametric formulas with t = tan(x/2) to express sin(x) and cos(x) in terms of t, simplifying the equation further. The discussion highlights different strategies for tackling complex trigonometric equations effectively.
wasteofo2
Messages
477
Reaction score
2
On my math final, there was this bastard of a trig problem that I simply couldn't solve. I knew the equations to use, how to solve the problem, but the answers just didn't work...

Anyway, the question was this:
Find all positive values of x for x being greater than or equal to zero, and less than or equal to 360.
3cos(x) + sin(x) - 1

How would you go about solving this? I tried graphing the equation and finding the x-intercept, but the values i got didn't work for whatever reason...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
When you say 360, do you mean degrees?
Since cos(x)=sqrt(1-sin2(x)), you can set it up as a quadratic equation in cos(x), solve and go from there - discarding any solutions where sin2+cos2 does not add up to 1.
 
The best way when you have a linear trig. equation is to use parametric formulae

t=tan(x/2)

then sin(x)=2t/(t^2+1) and cos(x)=(1-t^2)/(1+t^2)

you substitute them into the equation and solve it into t, simple, isn't it?

Never heard about that? Quite strange.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top