Golden Ratio Dragon Fractal (figured it out)

AI Thread Summary
The user successfully created the Golden Ratio Dragon Fractal using MS Excel after initially struggling with it. However, they encountered limitations due to Excel's precision, resulting in gaps in the fractal's major portions. The user managed to iterate the fractal 18 times, but faced significant performance issues, including multiple crashes during calculations. They questioned whether using different ratios, such as 1.7 or 1.5, would significantly alter the fractal's appearance. The discussion highlights the challenges of fractal generation with limited software capabilities.
EebamXela
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Back in november I asked the forum about this fractal:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Phi_glito.png

At the time I couldn't figure out how to make it.

Since then I've figured it out. I used MS Excel.

pyUJR5e.gif


I'm not completely satisfied though. There are some gaps between the major portions of the fractal that I'm pretty sure are a result of the limited precision of Excel. I'm not so good with coding, so I just brute forced it with the only program i know well.

Also, I was only able to iterate the fractal 18 times. My laptop was struggling hard to iterate the final step and even failed several times to do so. Excel crashed like 4 times in the middle of calculating. So i think a 19th is out of the question given my limited abilities.

Hi resolution:
http://i.imgur.com/lKXzIBH.jpg
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Is the Golden Ratio a requirement? If you were to use 1.7, or 1.6, or 1.5, or 2, how different would the figure be?
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top