Goldmans get rights to Simpson book

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Is Hard
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book
AI Thread Summary
A federal bankruptcy judge has granted Ron Goldman's family the rights to O.J. Simpson's canceled book, "If I Did It," which they plan to rename "Confessions of a Double Murderer." The discussion touches on the complexities of Simpson's legal situation, highlighting the contrast between his criminal acquittal and civil liability for the deaths of Goldman and Nicole Brown Simpson. Participants express confusion over the implications of being found innocent in a criminal trial yet liable in a civil suit, raising concerns about potential double jeopardy. The conversation also reflects on the historical context of the LAPD's conduct during the investigation and the broader principles of Constitutional Law involved in the case. The feasibility of publishing the book under the new title remains uncertain.
Math Is Hard
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,650
Reaction score
39
MIAMI - A federal bankruptcy judge Friday awarded Ron Goldman's family the rights to O.J. Simpson's canceled book, "If I Did It," which the Goldmans want to rename "Confessions of a Double Murderer."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070616/ap_on_en_ot/simpson_lawsuit
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
It is so strange to see Simpson in old movies. Or course, it was stranger to watch the LAPD chase him up the 405 fwy.

From what I heard about the book it did sound like a confession; almost like he wanted to tell everyone how smart he was. Still, I agreed with the criminal verdict of innocent. We can't allow cops to run amok no matter how sure they may be that a person is guilty. And the LAPD has a long history of abuse. I think Simpson was guilty but there was a greater principle at stake - Constitutional Law. And it was possible that evidence had been tampered with by Fuhrman and his buddy.

And, frankly, I think this idea of being innocent of a crime but guilty for civil liablity is hogwash. AFAIC it is double jeopardy.
 
Last edited:
Do you think they'll be able to put the book out with that new title?
 
I don't know. He was ruled liable for their deaths but found innocent of murder. Like I said, it makes no sense to me at all. If he was found innocent of committing murder, can he sue Goldman for calling him a murderer? I tend to think so. Unless they have taken the abuse of double jeopardy to the point of absurdity, which wouldn't surprise me at all.

This lists the findings of the jury in the civil suit. You tell me.
http://www.cnn.com/US/9702/04/jury.questions/index.html
 

Similar threads

Replies
71
Views
7K
Replies
39
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
5K
Back
Top